Medical Malpractice
IL • 2024-03-28
In 2020, a 13-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old male patient at Pavilion Behavioral Health System in Champaign, Illinois. The victim's mother filed a lawsuit alleging negligence, claiming the facility failed to prevent the assault by housing the patients in close proximity and lacking adequate supervision. In March 2024, a jury awarded $535 million in damages, comprising $60 million in compensatory and $475 million in punitive damages. Pavilion Behavioral Health System, a subsidiary of Universal Health Services (UHS), contested the verdict, describing it as unprecedented for a single-plaintiff injury case in Champaign County. In October 2024, the trial court reduced the punitive damages from $475 million to $120 million, resulting in a total award of $180 million. Pavilion intends to appeal the remaining judgment, and the plaintiff has 21 days to accept or refuse the reduced punitive damages.
No State • No Date
The case "Yanas v. Pagourtzis" involves a civil lawsuit filed by the families of victims from the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting in Texas. The plaintiffs allege that Dimitrios Pagourtzis' parents, Antonios Pagourtzis and Rose Marie Kosmetatos, failed to secure their firearms properly, allowing their son access to them. Additionally, the lawsuit claims the parents did not address their son's mental health issues, which contributed to the tragedy. () The trial is scheduled to begin on May 28, 2024, following a pre-trial conference on May 17, 2024. The plaintiffs seek accountability from the parents for not preventing their son's access to weapons and for not seeking necessary mental health counseling. The case has been ongoing for several years, with previous attempts to dismiss it unsuccessful. () The plaintiffs hope that this case will set a precedent for holding parents accountable in similar situations, aiming to prevent future tragedies. ()
Sources:
abc13.com
click2houston.com
No State • No Date
In 2009, the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) contracted Prairie Link Constructors JV—a joint venture of Fluor Enterprises and Balfour Beatty Infrastructure—to design and build a 6.5-mile stretch of the President George Bush Turnpike, including 96 retaining walls intended to last 100 years. By September 2020, one wall shifted several feet overnight, prompting an investigation that revealed 69 defective walls and three requiring immediate repair. NTTA filed a lawsuit in 2022, alleging breach of contract. In January 2025, a Dallas County jury awarded NTTA $280 million, finding that Prairie Link Constructors had breached the contract by failing to deliver the retaining walls as specified. ()
Sources:
texaslawbook.net
No State • No Date
"Estate of McDonald v. McDonald" is a legal case involving the McDonald family's estate and business interests. After the death of Chester S. McDonald, Sr., his children became involved in disputes over the family assets, including a corporation and a partnership. Chester's son, Chester Jr., was removed from the corporation's board in 1967, and his employment was terminated in 1969. Subsequently, Chester Jr. filed actions to dissolve both the family corporation and partnership. He also petitioned to remove Ronald McDonald as the executor of his father's estate, alleging a conflict of interest. The court examined the intentions of Chester Sr. and his wife, Margaret E. McDonald, regarding the distribution of family assets, finding that they intended equal shares for their four sons and equal shares for their daughters. The court concluded that the corporation was established to facilitate the management of the partnership's operations and was not an independent entity. Ultimately, the court held that the assets controlled by the corporation were considered assets of the partnership or the family. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Jane Doe v. New York City Department of Education*, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, alleged that she was sexually abused and harassed by employees of the New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) during her time in middle and high school. The primary allegations involved Mark Waltzer, a teacher who allegedly raped her when she was fifteen or sixteen years old. Additionally, she reported other incidents of harassment by different employees, including a janitor and a physical education teacher. Due to the trauma caused by these experiences, she eventually dropped out of high school. The case progressed through various motions, including a partial motion to dismiss granted by the court on March 20, 2023. Subsequently, Jane Doe filed a Third Amended Complaint on October 6, 2023, raising multiple claims against both Waltzer and NYC DOE. NYC DOE moved for summary judgment on the claims against it, leading to the court's current ruling on the matter. The court determined that the Child Victim's Act revived the plaintiff's claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), allowing those claims to proceed to trial. However, the court found that the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) claims did not survive because the relevant provisions at the time of the abuse did not include sex as a protected class. The court emphasized that the NYCHRL prohibited gender discrimination in educational settings at the time of the alleged abuse, thus permitting those claims to move forward. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *In the Interest of I.G.*, the Mississippi Supreme Court addressed procedural errors in a youth court proceeding concerning educational neglect. I.G., an eight-year-old girl, was found to have unexcused school absences, leading the court to mandate her parents ensure her attendance, with potential contempt charges for non-compliance. The court also placed I.G. in her biological father's custody and required counseling for her parents. However, the youth court failed to inform I.G.'s mother and stepfather of their right to counsel during the educational neglect hearing, violating Mississippi law, which mandates that judges inform parties of their rights, including the right to counsel, at the beginning of adjudicatory hearings. This omission hindered the parents' ability to effectively participate in their defense. Consequently, the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed the youth court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings, reinstating the parents' custody of I.G. pending proper hearings. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
In March 2018, a helicopter operated by Liberty Helicopters crashed into New York City's East River, resulting in the deaths of five passengers, including 26-year-old journalist Trevor Cadigan. The crash occurred after a passenger's harness tether inadvertently activated the helicopter's fuel shut-off switch, causing the engine to stop. The pilot managed to escape, but the passengers were trapped in their safety harnesses as the helicopter sank. () In 2024, a Manhattan jury awarded $116 million to Cadigan's family, attributing 42% of the fault to FlyNYON, which arranged the flight, 38% to Liberty Helicopters, and 20% to Dart Aerospace, the manufacturer of the flotation device that failed to deploy properly. () In March 2025, the family agreed to a $90 million settlement to conclude the case and prevent further appeals. () ## Jury Awards $116 Million to Family of New York Helicopter Crash Victim:
Sources:
apnews.com
timesunion.com
No State • No Date
In the 1972 case of *Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27*, Robert James Lubben, a graduate student, sought to prevent his induction into the military by claiming conscientious objector status. After receiving his induction notice, Lubben filed a lawsuit to stop the Local Board from inducting him, arguing he was entitled to an administrative appeal under the Supreme Court's decision in *Mulloy v. United States* (1970). The district court agreed, finding that the Board's actions amounted to a de facto reopening of his classification, which allowed for an administrative appeal. Consequently, the court issued an injunction preventing his induction until the Board formally reopened his classification and considered his claim. This case highlights the legal procedures and rights of individuals asserting conscientious objector status during the Vietnam War era. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In 2012, Richard Metcalf Jr. died while in custody at the Erie County Holding Center in New York. His father, Richard Metcalf Sr., filed a lawsuit alleging that the county and several deputies were responsible for his son's death. The case centered on claims of excessive force and inadequate medical care. In April 2024, a jury found Erie County and five deputies liable, awarding at least $95 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury determined that the deputies used excessive force and were deliberately indifferent to Metcalf's medical needs, leading to his death. The county was also found to have deprived Metcalf of adequate medical care. () The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court had previously dismissed certain claims against the county, stating that the duty to supervise and train deputies rested with the Sheriff, not the county. () As of February 2025, motions to stay the enforcement of the court's order were denied, allowing the damages to be pursued. ()
No State • No Date
In the case of Powell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), the plaintiff, Christine S. Powell, alleged employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. She claimed that WMATA denied her promotions in January 1999 based on her race and gender. To establish a prima facie case of discrimination, Powell needed to demonstrate that she was a member of a protected class, qualified for the promotions, and that the denial occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The court found that Powell failed to provide sufficient evidence to meet these criteria. Specifically, there was no objective evidence showing that the denial was due to discrimination, and the employer's subsequent promotions of Powell undermined her claims. Consequently, the court granted summary judgment in favor of WMATA, dismissing Powell's discrimination claims. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
IL • 1986-11-05
In the case of Spicer v. City of Chicago, William R. Spicer filed a lawsuit against the City of Chicago and other defendants, seeking a temporary restraining order and other injunctive relief. The Circuit Court of Cook County dismissed his complaint, and Spicer appealed the decision. The Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirmed the dismissal, stating that the trial court did not err in denying the request for injunctive relief and granting the motion to dismiss. The court's decision was filed on November 5, 1986.
WY • 1979-01-01
The case of "Housen, et al. v. Goodall, et al." involves a legal dispute between Margaret Housen and "Pony" Duke. In April 1970, Housen and Duke began a romantic relationship, during which they engaged in sexual intercourse across various states. After the relationship ended, Duke informed Housen that he had gonorrhea and was receiving treatment. Subsequently, Housen contracted the disease and later developed abdominal adhesions, leading to chronic pain. In April 1974, Housen filed a negligence lawsuit against Duke in Wyoming state court, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. Duke argued that the statute of limitations in the state where the injury occurred should apply, potentially barring the claim. The trial court ruled in favor of Housen, awarding her $1.3 million in damages. Duke appealed, but the Wyoming Supreme Court upheld the decision, affirming the application of Wyoming's statute of limitations and the jury's verdict in favor of Housen. ()
Sources:
quimbee.com
No State • No Date
In the case of **Beauchamp v. City of New York**, the plaintiffs, Jeremy Beauchamp and Antonio Marin, alleged they were assaulted and falsely arrested by off-duty New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) police officers. The NYCHA sought to dismiss the claims, arguing that the officers were not acting within the scope of their employment. The Supreme Court of Queens County granted the motion, but the Appellate Division reversed this decision. The appellate court determined that there were factual issues regarding whether the officers' actions were within their employment scope, making it inappropriate to dismiss the case at that stage. The court emphasized that such determinations are typically for a jury to decide, as they depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the incident. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In April 2024, a Dallas jury awarded $71.95 million to Laura Lopez, the widow of Hernan Murillo, who died in a workplace accident at a Frito-Lay warehouse in 2019. Murillo, an electrician, was operating a scissor lift when it collided with a boom lift operated by an employee of Walker Industrial LLC, leading to his fatal injuries. Lopez sued Walker Engineering Inc., alleging they allowed an unqualified employee to operate the boom lift. The defense argued that the boom lift operator was employed by Walker Industrial LLC, a separate entity, and that Murillo was at fault for positioning his scissor lift near the boom lift. After deliberations, the jury found Walker Engineering 65% liable and Walker Industrial 35% liable. Under Texas law, this made Walker Engineering responsible for the entire award. The jury's decision surpassed the defense's highest settlement offer of $1.25 million. ()
Sources:
blog.cvn.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Nunez v. Comprehensive Care Svcs., Inc." It's possible that the case name is misspelled, or it might be a less-publicized case. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Rodriguez v. Perryman, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or nature of the case, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In September 2024, a Texas jury awarded $59.7 million to Kiet "Ricky" Tuan Do, who became paralyzed due to alleged medical negligence at Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas. () In August 2019, Do sought emergency care for severe neck and back pain at Christus Southeast Texas Mid-County Outpatient Center. Despite initial CT scans being normal, his condition worsened, leading to his transfer to Baptist Beaumont Hospital. There, delays in performing an MRI and consulting specialists resulted in a critical spinal mass going undiagnosed for over 20 hours. By the time surgery was performed, the damage was irreversible, leaving Do permanently paralyzed. () The jury found Baptist Beaumont Hospital 90% at fault, with doctors Girishkumar Kansara and Isaac Choi each bearing 5% of the blame. The substantial award underscores the importance of timely medical intervention and hospital accountability in preventing life-altering consequences. ()
Sources:
law.com
medicalmalpracticelawyers.com
expertinstitute.com
No State • No Date
In 2016, independent contractor Pablo Scipione was performing electrical work atop a train at Kinkisharyo International's Palmdale facility when he slipped and fell, sustaining a microfracture in his left foot. Despite returning to work, he later developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, a chronic pain condition. Scipione filed a negligence lawsuit against Kinkisharyo, alleging unsafe working conditions, including a wet and improperly dried train and inadequate lighting. The company contested liability, arguing he was an employee limited to workers' compensation benefits. After an eight-year legal battle, a Los Angeles County jury awarded Scipione $58.35 million in compensatory and punitive damages, highlighting the company's negligence in maintaining a safe workplace. ()
Sources:
binghamtonherald.com
No State • No Date
In **Thompson v. Ford Motor Company**, the plaintiff, Q.J. Thompson, purchased a truck from an authorized Ford dealer in South Carolina. The truck was under warranty from Ford but developed serious mechanical defects that the dealer couldn't repair. Thompson attempted to serve a summons to Ford by delivering it to C.E. McAlister, an employee of Ford, while he was in Branchville, South Carolina. Ford contested this service, arguing that McAlister wasn't authorized to receive it and that the company wasn't doing business in South Carolina. The Circuit Judge agreed and set aside the service, leading Thompson to appeal. The Supreme Court of South Carolina held that Ford was indeed doing business in the state and that service upon McAlister was valid, thus reversing the Circuit Judge's order. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
IL • 2024-12-22
In December 2024, a Cook County jury awarded $66 million to the family of Idalia Corcoles, a 39-year-old Chicago mother of four, who died from complications following a liposuction procedure at the 63rd Medical and Surgical Center. The lawsuit alleged that Dr. Ayoub Sayeg, the surgeon responsible, failed to perform a thorough pre-surgical examination, did not obtain necessary medical clearance, and negligently conducted the surgery, leading to internal bleeding and a perforated abdominal wall. Furthermore, Dr. Sayeg admitted to not monitoring Corcoles post-operatively, resulting in her death from blood loss. This verdict stands as one of the largest known judgments in Cook County against a plastic surgeon and potentially the highest in Illinois for medical malpractice. ()
Sources:
hoodline.com
IL • 2022-06-02
In the case of Pierce v. Cherukuri, Susan Pierce filed a medical malpractice lawsuit on behalf of her husband, Craig, against Dr. Sudha Cherukuri and several Fresenius entities in Cook County, Illinois. Craig had received treatment for atrial fibrillation and subsequent dialysis care from the defendants, alleging that negligent care led to a stroke that impaired his abilities. The defendants sought to transfer the case to McDonough County under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, arguing that the alleged negligent acts occurred there and that many potential witnesses were located in or near McDonough County. The circuit court denied their motions to transfer, leading to an interlocutory appeal by the defendants. The appellate court ultimately affirmed the circuit court's decision, concluding that the defendants had not shown that the balance of relevant factors strongly favored a transfer.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Mount v. CHP, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
IL • 2024-02-29
Antonio DeAngelo, a landscaper from Hoffman Estates, Illinois, suffered a debilitating stroke in 2015 after his physician at Advocate Physician Partners failed to properly assess and treat his elevated blood pressure. Despite presenting with symptoms indicating hypertension, the physician misdiagnosed him with bronchitis and did not address his high blood pressure. Approximately four weeks later, DeAngelo experienced a hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in permanent disabilities, including difficulty walking, speaking, and performing daily activities. In February 2024, a Cook County jury awarded DeAngelo a $39.9 million verdict, marking the highest reported award for a stroke-related lawsuit in Illinois. The jury found that the physician's negligence directly led to DeAngelo's stroke and subsequent disabilities. ()
Sources:
chicago.suntimes.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Markert v. Shore Memorial Hospital." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Former Student v. Pomona Unified School District*, a former student sued the district, alleging that it failed to provide a fair hearing during a sexual assault investigation. The student claimed that the district's procedures violated their rights, leading to an unjust outcome. The court ruled in favor of the former student, ordering the district to pay $130,000 in damages for the denial of a fair hearing. ()
Sources:
tsl.news
No State • No Date
In the 2015 case B.H. v. County of San Bernardino, a private citizen reported suspected child abuse involving a two-year-old named B.H. during a visit with his father. Deputy Sheriff Kimberly Swanson investigated and concluded there was no abuse, failing to cross-report the allegations to the child welfare agency as required by the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (CANRA). Approximately three weeks later, B.H. suffered severe head injuries during another visit with his father. Representing B.H., a guardian sued the county and Deputy Swanson for not fulfilling their mandatory reporting duties under CANRA. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, stating there was no duty to cross-report and that they were immune from liability. The California Supreme Court partially reversed this decision, ruling that the Sheriff's Department had a mandatory duty to cross-report the abuse allegations to the child welfare agency. However, it held that Deputy Swanson did not have a duty to report her investigative findings, as her role was to investigate, not to report. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Curtis v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.*, Kimberly Curtis sustained severe injuries when a bathroom door collapsed on her during a stay at the Hilton Garden Inn New York/Central Park on September 4, 2015. The plaintiffs, Kimberly and Scott Curtis, filed a lawsuit against Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Hilton Garden Inn New York/Central Park, Hilton Garden Inns Management LLC, Moinian LLC, The Moinian Development Group LLC, 237 West 54th Street LLC, Pav-Lak Contracting Inc., and Kota Drywall Corp. The plaintiffs alleged negligence in the maintenance and installation of the bathroom door. The jury awarded Kimberly Curtis $250,000 for past pain and suffering, $1,000,000 for future pain and suffering, $830,262 for future medical expenses, $45,410 for future rehabilitation services, and $30,000,000 in punitive damages. The court remitted the punitive damages to $10,000,000, which the plaintiffs accepted. The defendants were also ordered to pay the present value of future damages and attorney's fees, totaling $1,731,918. The case was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with proceedings ongoing as of January 2025. (, )
Sources:
casetext.com
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
In 2018, 51-year-old Saverio Sasso was admitted to Cleveland Clinic Florida's emergency department with severe back pain and symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Despite being at high risk for septic shock, he was placed in an intermediate care unit instead of intensive care. His condition worsened, leading to a failed intubation attempt that deprived his brain of oxygen for 14 minutes, resulting in an anoxic brain injury. Sasso died a week later. In 2024, a Broward County jury found the hospital negligent and awarded nearly $32 million to his estate, including $30 million for pain and suffering, loss of companionship, and guidance to his minor daughter, and approximately $1.9 million for medical expenses, funeral services, and loss of support. The Cleveland Clinic Florida denied the allegations, attributing Sasso's death to congenital medical conditions, and stated they were evaluating their options following the verdict. ()
Sources:
insurancejournal.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Waite v. Shaikh, et al.*, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal addressed a medical malpractice claim involving the death of Hannah L. Waite. The personal representative of her estate, Lesley Waite, filed a lawsuit against Dr. Rabia Shaikh, Dr. Andrew C. Daley, and Advanced Care Hospitalists, P.L., alleging negligence in the care provided to Hannah Waite. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants, granting their motion for judgment on the pleadings. Lesley Waite appealed this decision. On June 13, 2025, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, agreeing that the defendants were not liable for the alleged malpractice. The court's decision was unanimous, with Judges LaRose, Khouzam, and Black concurring. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the 2015 Ohio Supreme Court case *State v. Bode*, the court addressed whether a juvenile's prior adjudication could be used to enhance a later adult conviction when the juvenile had no attorney and did not waive the right to counsel. Jason T. Bode was adjudicated delinquent in 1992 for an offense equivalent to operating a vehicle under the influence (OVI). He was not represented by an attorney during this proceeding. As an adult, Bode was convicted of OVI multiple times, and in 2011, his sentence was enhanced based on his prior juvenile adjudication. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that juveniles have a constitutional right to counsel in delinquency proceedings where confinement is possible. Since Bode's juvenile adjudication lacked legal representation and a waiver of counsel, it could not be used to enhance his adult sentence. The court emphasized that the right to counsel is essential to protect juveniles' due-process rights. ()
Sources:
courtnewsohio.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of *Bright v. Sutter Medical Group of the Redwoods*, the plaintiff, Bright, filed a lawsuit against Sutter Medical Group of the Redwoods, alleging that the medical group failed to provide timely and proper utilization review, leading to inadequate medical care. The court examined whether the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), PacifiCare, could be held vicariously liable for the actions of its contracted medical group, Bright. The court concluded that under California Health and Safety Code section 1371.25, PacifiCare was not liable for Bright's conduct because the plaintiffs did not appeal Bright's decision to PacifiCare. This decision aligns with the ruling in *Watanabe v. California Physicians’ Service*, which held that an HMO cannot be held vicariously liable for the actions of its contracted providers when the plaintiffs fail to appeal the provider's decision to the HMO. ()
Sources:
plaintiffmagazine.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Applestein, et al. v. Kleinhendler, et al.*, Allan Applestein, an elderly businessman diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, sold a 1,000-acre property known as Fones Cliffs to Virginia True Corporation (VTC), a company co-owned by his attorney, Howard Kleinhendler. Applestein alleged that Kleinhendler, who also represented him in the transaction, failed to disclose the conflict of interest and did not advise him to secure a lien on the property. Instead, Applestein provided an unsecured loan of $7 million to VTC, which later defaulted and filed for bankruptcy. In September 2024, a jury found Kleinhendler liable for legal malpractice, fraudulent inducement, and exploitation of a vulnerable adult, awarding Applestein over $26 million in damages. The court also determined that Kleinhendler's law firm, Wachtel Missry LLP, was vicariously liable for his actions. In January 2024, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the firm's insurance policy did not cover the claims due to a "business enterprise exclusion," as the alleged misconduct arose from Kleinhendler's role in VTC. (, )
Sources:
abajournal.com
jdsupra.com
No State • No Date
In January 2021, Christy Lynn Trimbath, a woman over 65 from Idaho, was admitted to Citrus Memorial Hospital in Inverness, Florida, for medical treatment. That evening, nurse Hiram Bonilla sexually assaulted her multiple times between 10 PM and 2:30 AM. The hospital delayed reporting the incident to law enforcement for six hours, during which they informed Bonilla of the allegations, allowed him to leave, interviewed witnesses, and cleaned the crime scene. The hospital had prior knowledge of sexual assaults committed by nurses on its premises, including 41 settled claims from 2005 and multiple assaults by nurse Mark Miskar between 2016 and 2020. Bonilla had a prior accusation of sexually assaulting a minor patient at another hospital in 2016 before CMH hired him. () Trimbath filed a lawsuit against Citrus Memorial Hospital, alleging negligence, premises liability, negligent supervision, aiding and abetting, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, negligent hiring, and medical malpractice. The jury found the hospital negligent in supervising its staff, providing adequate security, and in the nursing care and treatment of Trimbath. They awarded her $25 million in damages, comprising $5 million for past damages and $20 million for future damages. ()
Sources:
jurimatic.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find specific information about a case titled "Jones v. New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details, such as the case number, date, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of **Tucker v. Bay Shore Union Free School District**, the plaintiffs, Pamela and Michael Tucker, sought reimbursement for expenses incurred when they enrolled their handicapped child in a private school. They based their claim on the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), arguing that the Bay Shore Union Free School District failed to provide appropriate public education for their child. The district court dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), stating that the Tuckers did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed this decision, agreeing that the complaint did not meet the necessary legal standards. ()
Sources:
law.resource.org
No State • No Date
In the case of *Lemache v. Elk Manhasset LLC*, two workers, Juan Lemache and Segundo Lluilema, were performing stucco work on a building owned by Elk Manhasset LLC. While standing atop a ladder-scaffold, the scaffold collapsed unexpectedly, causing them to fall approximately 15 feet to the ground. At the time, they were not using fall-arrest safety devices, as there were no known tie-off points available. () The workers filed a lawsuit under New York's Labor Law § 240(1), which mandates that property owners provide proper safety equipment to protect workers from elevation-related hazards. The court granted the workers partial summary judgment on this claim, determining that Elk Manhasset LLC failed to provide adequate safety measures. The court also dismissed the workers' Labor Law § 241(6) claim as academic, as it was no longer relevant. () Elk Manhasset LLC sought indemnification from Anchor Contracting NY, Corp., the contractor that employed the workers, based on a contractual agreement. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Elk on this claim, finding that the indemnification agreement was valid and enforceable. Additionally, the court dismissed the workers' common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 claims, as they were considered abandoned. () In summary, the court held Elk Manhasset LLC liable for failing to provide necessary safety equipment under Labor Law § 240(1) and upheld the indemnification agreement with Anchor Contracting NY, Corp.
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In 2018, 48-year-old Jesus Eduardo Espitia was hospitalized at Westchester Medical Center in New York after a serious cycling accident. During his recovery, he developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a condition where blood clots form in the veins. Despite signs indicating this risk, the medical staff failed to monitor and prevent the development of a pulmonary embolism—a life-threatening blockage in the lungs caused by a blood clot. This oversight led to Espitia's death from cardiac arrest on December 23, 2018. () In May 2024, a jury awarded $23.3 million to Espitia's family in a medical malpractice lawsuit against the hospital. The jury found that the medical team was negligent in monitoring for and preventing the blood clot that resulted in Espitia's death. () This case highlights the critical importance of hospitals adhering to standard protocols to prevent complications like DVT and pulmonary embolism, which can be fatal if not properly managed.
Sources:
gunzburglaw.com
law.com
IL • 2024-05-01
In January 2017, Alexis Willis presented to Advocate Trinity Hospital in Chicago with decreased fetal movement. Despite signs indicating fetal distress, the medical team failed to perform a timely cesarean section. Approximately 25 minutes before delivery, the baby's heart rate dropped and did not recover, leading to hypoxic-ischemic brain damage and cerebral palsy. In May 2024, a Cook County jury unanimously found the hospital's staff negligent and awarded $23,070,000 to the child, Na'Jai Johnson, to cover her lifetime medical expenses.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Shif v. Friedman, et al." It's possible that the case name is misspelled or not widely reported. Could you please provide more details or verify the case name? This will help me assist you more effectively.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Dominguez v. Friedman, M.D.*, the plaintiff alleged that Dr. Friedman failed to take a comprehensive medical history and discharged the patient without proper diagnosis and treatment, leading to the patient's injuries. The court found that the plaintiff presented sufficient medical evidence to support the claim that Dr. Friedman's actions were a substantial factor in causing the injuries. The court also addressed the admissibility of certain documents, noting that the New York City Police Department produced the documents, and the defendant had the opportunity to authenticate them during the trial but did not do so. Additionally, the court applied the "loss of chance" doctrine, stating that the defendant's failure to perform necessary tests deprived the plaintiff of a substantial chance for an improved outcome. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the 1988 case of *Gonzalez v. The County of Los Angeles*, the California Court of Appeal addressed the timeliness of a lawsuit filed against the county. The plaintiffs had filed a claim with the county, which was rejected. They then filed a lawsuit within six months of the rejection notice. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the county, suggesting the lawsuit was untimely. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, stating that the plaintiffs' action was timely filed. The case was remanded to the superior court for further proceedings consistent with this ruling. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In 2018, 22-year-old Brandon Begley attended a retreat at Soul Quest Church of Mother Earth in Orlando, Florida, where participants consumed ayahuasca, a potent psychedelic brew containing DMT, and kambo, a secretion from the Amazonian frog. After ingesting these substances, Begley drank excessive amounts of water, leading to severe hyponatremia—a dangerously low sodium level. Despite exhibiting symptoms such as seizures and unresponsiveness, Soul Quest staff delayed seeking emergency medical assistance for several hours. By the time help arrived, it was too late to save Begley. () In 2020, Begley's parents filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Soul Quest and its founder, Christopher Young. The case went to trial in May 2024, and the jury found both the church and Young liable for Begley's death. They were ordered to pay a total of $15 million in damages, with 40% of the liability assigned to Soul Quest and 60% to Young. The jury rejected the defense's argument that Begley had misrepresented his medical history or contributed to his own death. () Despite the jury's verdict, Soul Quest continued to operate, hosting regular retreats and generating significant income. In 2022, the church reported nearly $7.5 million in revenue, with Young receiving an annual salary of approximately $320,000. However, in July 2024, a Florida court rejected Soul Quest's motion to declare bankruptcy, citing the church's ongoing operations and substantial revenue. This decision underscored the court's determination to hold the church accountable for its actions. () Additionally, Soul Quest had previously petitioned the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for a religious exemption to use ayahuasca, a Schedule I controlled substance. In 2016, the DEA denied the petition, concluding that the church had not demonstrated that its use of ayahuasca was a sincere religious exercise and that it had not met the requirements under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, reinforcing the DEA's authority to regulate controlled substances and denying the church's request for a religious exemption. () The events surrounding Brandon Begley's death and the subsequent legal actions have highlighted the risks associated with unregulated psychedelic ceremonies. While substances like ayahuasca and kambo have deep roots in indigenous traditions, their use in commercial settings without proper oversight can lead to dangerous outcomes. Experts argue that there is a need for standardized safety protocols and regulations to ensure the well-being of participants in psychedelic ceremonies. ()
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Gregory v. Crews, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely documented or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
IL • 2024-03-08
In 2016, Omotola Oyedapo, 33 weeks pregnant, was transported by ambulance to the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) due to severe abdominal pain and low blood pressure. Paramedics notified the hospital of a potential obstetric emergency, but upon arrival, UCMC failed to promptly assess the fetal heart rate. The first check occurred 40 minutes later, revealing a dangerously low rate. Despite this, the hospital delayed the emergency delivery by over an hour. The child, Oluwasemilore "Praise" Oyedapo, was born with severe brain injuries, resulting in blindness, quadriplegic cerebral palsy, and total dependence for daily activities. Praise lived in this condition until his death in December 2020. In March 2024, a Cook County jury unanimously found UCMC liable for the wrongful death, awarding over $14 million in damages to the estate. The jury determined that the hospital's negligence in delaying the delivery directly caused Praise's injuries and subsequent death.
DE • No Date
In January 2022, Michelle Brown and Crisanto Gomes, shareholders of Nikola Corporation, filed a derivative lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against certain current and former directors of the company. The plaintiffs alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, insider selling, aiding and abetting insider selling, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate assets. On January 28, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a stipulation and proposed order to consolidate this action with another related case, the BeHage Rowe Action. The court granted the consolidation on February 1, 2022. Subsequently, on February 15, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Amended Stockholder Derivative Complaint. On June 1, 2022, following oral arguments, the court granted the defendants' motions to stay the remaining counts of the Amended Complaint. The court ordered the defendants to submit a status report by October 31, 2022, or within three days of receiving a decision on the motions to dismiss in the related shareholder securities litigation. ()
Sources:
sec.gov
No State • No Date
"Eggleston v. Aftab" is a legal case involving a divorce proceeding between Theresa Havell and Aftab Islam. During the trial, the court considered the defendant husband's conduct, which included verbal and physical abuse towards his wife and children, as well as an attempted murder of his wife that resulted in severe and permanent injuries. These actions occurred in the presence of their children. The court found the husband's behavior to be so egregious that it "shocked the conscience." Consequently, the court awarded Theresa Havell more than 95 percent of the estimated $17 million in marital assets, most of which she had contributed. ()
Sources:
gothamgazette.com
No State • No Date
The case "Estate of McPherson v. Delta Healthcare II, LLC, et al." involves a legal dispute between the estate of a deceased individual, McPherson, and Delta Healthcare II, LLC, along with other associated parties. The estate alleges that Delta Healthcare II, LLC, and its affiliates were responsible for the wrongful death of McPherson. The specifics of the allegations and the legal arguments presented by both parties are not detailed in the available sources. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida on January 24, 2025. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
CO • 2021-06-03
In "Cribari v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company," Beverly Cribari filed a lawsuit against her insurer, Allstate, after being injured in a car accident with an underinsured motorist. Cribari settled with the at-fault driver for $100,000 and subsequently sought additional compensation under her own underinsured motorist policy with Allstate. The insurer initially denied the claim, asserting that Cribari's damages did not meet the policy's threshold. However, after further evaluation, Allstate acknowledged the claim's validity and issued a $250,000 payment under a reservation of rights, indicating potential recoupment if Cribari failed to cooperate with the investigation. Cribari alleged that Allstate acted in bad faith by delaying and denying her claim. The case proceeded through various legal motions and appeals, with the Tenth Circuit Court ultimately affirming the district court's decisions, including the denial of summary judgment and the exclusion of certain evidence, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Arcuri Sr. v. San Brook Contracting Inc., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the 1986 case of *Lee v. Lehman*, the Ninth Circuit Court addressed a dispute involving the custody of children. The court concluded that such custody disputes, which primarily concern parental rights and child upbringing, do not sufficiently involve federal interests to warrant federal habeas corpus jurisdiction. As a result, the court affirmed the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition, emphasizing that these matters should be resolved within the state court system. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Cordova v. Conelle Construction Corp.*, Nelson Rosendo Cordova, an employee of a demolition company, was injured while working on a building renovation. He was instructed to cut a pipe extending from the ceiling on the ninth floor. During this task, the severed pipe struck the ladder he was standing on, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. Cordova filed a lawsuit under New York Labor Law § 240(1), which mandates that contractors and owners provide proper protection to workers when performing tasks that involve a risk of falling. The Supreme Court, Kings County, granted summary judgment in favor of Cordova, determining that the defendants violated the statute by failing to provide adequate safety measures, and that this violation was the direct cause of his injury. The court also ruled that Cordova was entitled to recover damages for lost wages, regardless of his immigration status.
IL • 2024-02-28
In February 2024, a Tazewell County Circuit Court jury awarded over $10 million to Ronald Jacobs and his wife, Brenda, in a medical malpractice case against OSF St. Francis Medical Center in Peoria, Illinois. Ronald Jacobs, 66, was admitted to the hospital in November 2020 with sudden back pain. A CT scan revealed a significant lesion at the T11 vertebra, but an MRI was delayed due to his inability to remain still. During this delay, his condition deteriorated, leading to paraplegia. The hospital admitted fault three weeks before the trial. The jury awarded $8 million for pain, suffering, and loss of a normal life, and $1 million to Brenda for loss of consortium. The total award was $10,004,537.98, marking the second-highest verdict in Tazewell County history. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to tax prejudgment interest, potentially increasing the judgment to over $11.6 million.
No State • No Date
"Baxter v. Pittman, et al." is a legal case filed by Victor Lawrence Baxter against the State of Texas, Tarrant County, Texas, and Molly Westfall in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The case, numbered 4:2023cv00656, was initiated on June 26, 2023. Baxter, the plaintiff, filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) on August 15, 2023. The court granted this motion, resulting in the dismissal of the case without prejudice on August 16, 2023. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Pessolano v. Richmond University Medical Center*, the plaintiff alleged that the medical center and its staff were responsible for the death of Joanna Pessolano due to medical malpractice. The jury awarded $4 million for her conscious pain and suffering and an additional $4 million for her fear of impending death. The defendants contested the awards, arguing they were excessive and that the jury instructions were flawed. However, the court upheld the jury's verdict, stating that the awards were not excessive and that the jury instructions were appropriate. The court also noted that the defendants had waived certain objections by not raising them during the trial. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Buckheit, as Administrator of Williams Estate v. Golden, et al.*, the administrator of Annie Williams' estate filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Owen Golden, Dr. Robert S. Bressner, Dr. Jonathan T. Chang, Gold Crest Care Center, and Amber Court of Pelham Gardens. Annie Williams, the decedent, experienced multiple falls while under the care of these medical professionals and facilities between March and June 2012. Following these incidents, she was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma and passed away on July 10, 2012. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants' negligence led to her injuries and subsequent death. Dr. Golden and Amber Court of Pelham Gardens sought summary judgment to dismiss the complaint, arguing that no material issues of fact existed. They submitted expert affirmations to support their motions. The court's decision on these motions is not specified in the available sources. ()
Sources:
casemine.com
IL • 2024-06-15
In the case of Srebrov v. Alexian Brothers Ambulatory Group, Simeon Srebrov visited an urgent care center complaining of coughing and shortness of breath. Dr. Celeste Galizia diagnosed him with rapid atrial fibrillation and prescribed metoprolol and an antibiotic, advising him to follow up with his primary care physician. Srebrov later suffered a stroke, resulting in permanent brain and motor deficits. He filed a lawsuit against Dr. Galizia and Alexian Brothers Ambulatory Group, alleging that Dr. Galizia failed to take a thorough medical history and did not prescribe anticoagulation therapy with a rapidly acting oral anticoagulant. A Cook County, Illinois jury awarded Srebrov a $9.35 million verdict in his favor.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Miranda v. Curry, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Safir v. Kaplan, M.D., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In 2024, a federal jury awarded $9 million in damages to tennis player Kylie McKenzie, who accused the United States Tennis Association (USTA) of failing to protect her from sexual assault by her coach, Anibal Aranda. McKenzie, a promising young player, alleged that Aranda engaged in inappropriate behavior, including unwanted physical contact and sexual assault, during her training at the USTA's facility in Florida. The lawsuit claimed that the USTA was negligent in supervising Aranda and failed to implement adequate safety measures to protect athletes. The jury awarded McKenzie $3 million in compensatory damages and $6 million in punitive damages. The USTA expressed sympathy for McKenzie but announced plans to appeal the decision, arguing that the ruling set an unreasonable expectation for victims to report incidents. ()
Sources:
espn.com
CA • 2024-12-31
In 2024, the case "Feld v. San Diego Chiropractic Neurology by Albinder & Jahangiri APC, et al." resulted in a significant jury award of $8,924,000. The lawsuit involved allegations of medical malpractice, personal injury, and professional negligence against the defendants, including San Diego Chiropractic Neurology by Albinder & Jahangiri APC. The plaintiff, Daniel Feld, claimed that the defendants' actions led to a brain injury due to failure to treat, resulting in bodily harm. The case was filed in San Diego County, California, and concluded with the jury's verdict in 2024. ()
Sources:
topverdict.com
CA • No Date
In the case of Mitrione v. Breg Inc., Rebecca Mitrione filed a lawsuit against Breg Inc., a medical device manufacturer, alleging that the company's Polar Care Glacier pain pump device caused her significant injuries. The Polar Care Glacier is designed to deliver continuous cold therapy to patients post-surgery. Mitrione contended that the device's design was defective and that Breg Inc. failed to provide adequate warnings regarding potential risks associated with its use. The legal proceedings involved extensive discovery disputes, including a motion for a protective order filed by Breg Inc. to prevent the deposition of former CEO Bradley Mason. The court denied this motion, emphasizing the necessity of Mason's testimony due to his unique knowledge about the device's design and marketing. In March 2024, the court tentatively ruled that Mitrione's total damages were approximately $2 million, considering both economic and non-economic factors. The case highlights ongoing concerns about the safety and regulatory oversight of medical devices, particularly those intended for post-operative care.
CA • 2024-06-01
Angel Aguirre, a stagehand at the Rolling Loud Festival in Oakland, suffered severe injuries when his right hand was crushed by a moving forklift operated by another stagehand. The accident resulted in nerve and tendon damage, leading to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a debilitating chronic pain condition. Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team, LLP represented Aguirre in a lawsuit against AEG Management Oakland, LLC and Tommy Harman. The jury awarded Aguirre $8.29 million in damages, recognizing the significance of the case for workplace safety and liability law. ()
Sources:
aswtlawyers.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "B.K. v. KSM Sch. III LLC." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, court, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
CA • No Date
In August 2023, Martinez police officers responded to a burglar alarm at a cannabis dispensary. During the incident, two brothers, Tahmon and Tommy Wilson, fled the scene in a sedan. Officers fired into the vehicle, fatally injuring Tahmon and severely wounding Tommy, both unarmed. The Wilson family filed a civil rights lawsuit against the City of Martinez and the involved officers, alleging unlawful use of force. The California Department of Justice is conducting an independent investigation into the officers' actions. ()
Sources:
cbsnews.com
IL • 2024-09-12
In 2018, 67-year-old Deborah Giorno from Ingleside, Illinois, experienced worsening fatigue, shortness of breath, and chest heaviness over a 16-month period. Despite these symptoms and diagnostic evidence indicating a deteriorating aortic valve, her healthcare providers at Advocate Medical Group failed to refer her for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. As a result, Giorno passed away on March 28, 2018, just one week before the scheduled procedure. In September 2024, a Cook County jury awarded her family an $8 million verdict, including $2.4 million for grief and mental suffering. The court added $1.53 million in pre-judgment interest, bringing the total to $9.53 million. ()
Sources:
cliffordlaw.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Becerra v. Miami-Dade County, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, court, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Dominguez v. Silvershore Properties 96 LLC*, the plaintiff, Lazaro Hernandez Dominguez, entered into a contract to purchase a property from Silvershore Properties 96 LLC. The agreed-upon sale price was $5.5 million. However, disputes arose regarding the property's condition, including issues with tenants and potential title defects. Dominguez sought specific performance of the contract, aiming to compel the sale. The court found that while the parties had agreed to waive the original closing date of June 24, 2014, they failed to establish a new closing date. Additionally, Dominguez could not demonstrate that he was ready, willing, and able to perform his obligations under the contract. Consequently, the court denied his request for specific performance. However, the court also determined that it would be unjust for the defendants to retain the plaintiff's down payment due to material misrepresentations made by the seller. Therefore, Dominguez was entitled to a refund of all unreimbursed expenses incurred in pursuing the contract, including the down payment. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
CA • 2024-04-16
In September 2019, 58-year-old Jaime Soria, who had spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, was admitted to Antelope Valley Hospital in California for aspiration pneumonia and severe sepsis. Due to swallowing difficulties, he was placed on a 'nothing by mouth' (NPO) restriction. On September 24, 2019, a food tray was mistakenly delivered to his room. After inquiring about its safety, Jaime's mother fed him from the tray. He immediately began coughing, gagging, and vomiting, leading to aspiration into his lungs. Jaime passed away on September 26, 2019. His mother, Celia Soria, and sister, Lilia Soria Trujillo, filed a lawsuit against the hospital, a nurse, Compass Group USA, Inc. (the hospital's contracted food and nutrition manager), and one of Compass's catering associates. The trial court ruled that certain allegations in the plaintiffs' complaint constituted binding admissions and instructed the jury accordingly. The court also determined that the plaintiffs were not entitled to punitive damages. The jury awarded $8 million in damages to Celia Soria, as the successor in interest to Jaime. Compass filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but granted the motion for a new trial in part, finding the damage award excessive. ()
Sources:
case-law.vlex.com
No State • No Date
In 2024, the case of *Michaels v. Baiji Chinman Gohil, MD* resulted in a $7.5 million verdict. () The lawsuit alleged medical malpractice, including delayed diagnosis, health facility negligence, surgical error, and inadequate care. The plaintiff, Michaels, claimed that Dr. Gohil's failure to diagnose and treat a medical condition in a timely manner led to significant bodily injury. The jury found in favor of Michaels, awarding substantial damages for the injuries sustained due to the doctor's negligence.
Sources:
topverdict.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a case titled "Lopez v. Los Angeles Unif. Sch. Dist." It's possible there might be a typographical error or the case is known by a different name. For instance, "Goss v. Lopez" is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case from 1975 that held public schools must conduct a hearing before suspending a student, as suspensions without a hearing violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. () Alternatively, "Lopez v. Tulare Joint Union High School Dist." is a California Court of Appeal decision from 1995. In this case, the court addressed the issue of prior restraint in student publications, concluding that the school district's prior restraint system was invalid because it was not authorized by the relevant statute. () If you can provide more details or clarify the case name, I'd be happy to assist further.
Sources:
supreme.justia.com
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Carlos v. Chavez*, filed on July 18, 2025, Rogelio Carlos, III sued Carlos Chavez, Virgilio Gonzalez, and others, including the City of San Antonio and its police department. Carlos alleged that he became paralyzed due to complications from neck injuries sustained during an arrest by the San Antonio Police Department on May 20, 2014. The paralysis did not occur until November 3, 2015, after he underwent surgery to address his neck injuries. The Carloses claimed that the actions of the neuromonitoring defendants, which included failing to monitor significant neurological changes during the surgery, contributed to his paralysis. The court allowed the Carloses to join the neuromonitoring defendants based on new evidence indicating their potential negligence. The neuromonitoring defendants filed motions to dismiss the state-law claims against them, arguing a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court determined that the state-law negligence claims were sufficiently related to the federal claims under § 1983, as they arose from the same core factual issue concerning Mr. Carlos's paralysis. The court emphasized that the federal and state claims derived from a common nucleus of operative fact, specifically the circumstances surrounding Mr. Carlos's paralysis. The court found no compelling reasons to decline the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction, as the state-law claims did not raise novel issues and were straightforward in nature. Additionally, the court noted that judicial economy and convenience favored hearing both claims together. Thus, the motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction were denied. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
No State • No Date
In August 2022, William Enyart died from alcohol withdrawal complications at the High Desert Detention Facility in San Bernardino County. His family filed a lawsuit against the County and several deputies, alleging that Deputy Aaron Conley failed to provide timely medical care, contributing to Enyart's death. The jury found Conley 60% responsible and awarded the family $6.5 million in damages. () The County appealed the decision, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on October 7, 2024, affirming the jury's verdict. () In a separate but related case, the family of William Enyart filed a lawsuit against the County and several deputies, alleging that Deputy Aaron Conley failed to provide timely medical care, contributing to Enyart's death. The jury found Conley 60% responsible and awarded the family $6.5 million in damages. () The County appealed the decision, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on October 7, 2024, affirming the jury's verdict. ()
CA • 2024-09-13
The case "Lopez, et al. v. Yoon, et al." involves a legal dispute between the plaintiffs, identified as Lopez and others, and the defendants, identified as Yoon and others. The specific details of the case, including the nature of the claims, the events leading to the lawsuit, and the legal issues at stake, are not readily available in the provided search results. Without access to the full case documents or more detailed information, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive summary of the case. For a more thorough understanding, consulting legal databases or court records would be advisable.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Ismail, et al. v. Amin, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, court, or year of the case, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Tillman v. City of New York*, the estate of George Homer Tillman III, represented by his wife, Antoinette Tillman, filed a lawsuit against the City of New York and several police officers. The lawsuit alleges that on April 17, 2016, Mr. Tillman was fatally shot by police officers during an encounter. The estate claims that the officers used excessive force, leading to wrongful death, and asserts violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York state law, including assault and battery. The defendants, including Sergeant Thomas Sorrentino and Officers Michael Renna, Kenneth Stallone, and Mateusz Krzeminski, have denied the allegations. In September 2022, the court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment, allowing the case to proceed. Subsequently, in February 2024, the court addressed discovery disputes, granting in part and denying in part motions related to subpoenas issued to the Suffolk County Police Department. The case remains ongoing, with the estate seeking justice for Mr. Tillman's death. ()
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
"Proctor v. Silver" is a legal case involving an individual named Proctor and a defendant named Silver. The case was heard by the California Court of Appeal in 1948. Proctor was employed by the California State Board of Architectural Examiners and was responsible for proctoring examinations. The issue at hand was whether Proctor had knowledge of and violated the Board's practice of keeping examination questions confidential. The court found that Proctor was aware of this practice and had a duty to maintain the secrecy of the examination materials. The case highlights the importance of adhering to established procedures and maintaining confidentiality in professional settings. ()
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Ferreira v. Volmar Constr. Inc., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, court, or year, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Flores v. NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation*, the plaintiffs, led by Luis Flores as the proposed administrator of Juan Flores's estate, alleged that medical negligence at Rikers Island Correctional Facility led to Juan Flores's death. They claimed that after a cardiac ablation procedure, Juan experienced chest pain, which they argued should have prompted healthcare providers to transfer him to Bellevue Hospital sooner. However, the court found that the defendants provided sufficient evidence showing their treatment met accepted medical standards and that the chest pain was consistent with the procedure's expected effects. The plaintiffs' expert testimony was deemed insufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact regarding the defendants' conduct or the causation of the death. Consequently, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing the complaint. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of Trimbath v. City of Lake Worth Beach, Case No. 50-2022-CA-005480, the City of Lake Worth Beach held a closed-door attorney-client session on July 16, 2024, to discuss settlement negotiations and litigation strategies related to this ongoing case. () The session was attended by the City Commission members, the Interim City Manager, the City Attorney, and outside counsel, with a certified court reporter present to transcribe the proceedings. The transcript of this session is expected to be made public upon the conclusion of the litigation. As of now, detailed information about the specific claims and legal arguments in the case is not publicly available.
Sources:
lakeworthbeachfl.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of *Hoiland v. AJD Construction Company*, filed in the New Jersey Superior Court, Hudson County, on July 12, 2019, the plaintiff, Donald Hoiland, initiated a personal injury lawsuit against AJD Construction Company. The case was assigned docket number L-002754-19 and was overseen by judges Kimberly Espinales-Maloney, Mary Costello, Joseph Isabella, Joseph Turula, and Vincent Militello. The lawsuit was reinstated after being previously dismissed. () Unfortunately, specific details regarding the nature of the injury, the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, and the final outcome are not readily available in the provided sources. For comprehensive information, it would be advisable to consult the court records directly or contact the parties involved.
Sources:
docketalarm.com
No State • No Date
The case "Estate of Hubler v. Fingerer, et al." involves a legal dispute over the estate of Ernest Hubler, who passed away in 2019. The plaintiffs, Ernest Hubler's heirs, filed a lawsuit against Dr. Walter Fingerer and other defendants, alleging medical malpractice and negligence that contributed to Hubler's death. The plaintiffs claim that Dr. Fingerer's actions led to Hubler's untimely death, thereby affecting the distribution of his estate. The defendants have filed motions to dismiss the case, arguing that the plaintiffs' claims are without merit and should be dismissed. As of April 14, 2022, the case was ongoing, with further legal proceedings anticipated to determine the outcome of the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants. ()
Sources:
docketalarm.com
No State • No Date
In the case of **Student v. Coronado Unified School District**, a high school student, referred to as G.W., initiated a peaceful protest against the district's mask mandate by attending school without a mask. In response, school staff required her to sit outside in cold conditions, marked her absent, and eventually suspended her for non-compliance. The district argued that these actions were necessary to enforce health and safety policies. G.W. and her mother filed a lawsuit alleging that the district's actions violated her rights. The court dismissed the complaint, stating that the district's enforcement of the mask mandate was within its legal authority and did not constitute retaliation. The court emphasized that the district's actions were in line with public health guidelines and did not infringe upon G.W.'s rights. ()
Sources:
case-law.vlex.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Highsmith v. Oyster Bay." It's possible that the case is not widely documented or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the year it was decided or the specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Dicarlo v. NYC Transit Authority, et al." It's possible that the case name is misspelled, or it might be a less-publicized case. If you can provide more details, such as the case number, date, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Lopez v. J.D. Abrams LP, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or nature of the case, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of **DeJesus v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.**, filed on March 9, 2018, Sylvia DeJesus sued Home Depot for personal injuries sustained at one of their stores. The lawsuit was initiated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. () Specific details about the incident leading to the lawsuit are not readily available in the provided sources. The case was assigned to Judge Robert W. Sweet. As of the latest available information, the case is ongoing, and no final judgment has been reported.
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a specific legal case titled "Estate of Sullivan v. Rojas, et al." However, there are several cases involving the name "Sullivan" and "Rojas" that might be relevant. For instance, in "Estate of Sullivan v. Rojas," the court addressed the authority of executors to hire an attorney to defend a will contest, even when the estate was later found to be insolvent. The court concluded that the executors acted within their rights, as defending the will was part of their duty, and reasonable attorney's fees could be charged against the estate. () Another case, "Estate of Sullivan v. US," involved a wrongful death claim where the court applied Arizona's medical malpractice law, determining that the United States could not invoke Indiana's Medical Malpractice Act and its liability cap. () Additionally, "Rojas v. The Estate of Wright" dealt with a fatal motor vehicle accident, where the court found that there was sufficient evidence of negligence on both sides, necessitating a trial to resolve the issues. () If you can provide more details or clarify the jurisdiction or context of the case you're interested in, I'd be happy to assist further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Sessa v. Peconic Bay Medical Center*, Judith Sessa sought medical attention at Peconic Bay Medical Center's emergency room on June 30, 2011, after injuring her left arm in a fall. She was diagnosed with a dislocated left elbow and treated by physicians Andrew Wackett and Brian McMahon, who performed elbow reduction procedures. Sessa was discharged but returned later that day with increased pain, swelling, and an inability to bend her fingers. Orthopedist John Brennan examined her and recommended a transfer to Stony Brook University Hospital for vascular consultation. Despite this, her condition worsened, leading to the amputation of her left arm below the elbow. Sessa filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Peconic Bay Medical Center, Wackett, McMahon, and Brennan, alleging negligence in their care. The Supreme Court of Suffolk County denied summary judgment motions from Wackett, McMahon, and Brennan, allowing the case to proceed. However, the court granted summary judgment to Peconic Bay Medical Center regarding vicarious liability for Brennan's actions. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed the denial of summary judgment for Wackett and McMahon, finding that Sessa raised triable issues of fact regarding their alleged departures from standard care. The court also found that Peconic Bay failed to establish that Brennan was not its agent, allowing the vicarious liability claim to proceed. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
No State • No Date
In September 2019, Jane Doe 1, a minor, traveled to Lima, Peru, with the United States Twirling Association (USTA) to represent the U.S. as a baton twirling ambassador. During this trip, she was allegedly drugged and sexually assaulted by Jacobo, the president of the Lima Lions Club, who was a local sponsor for the event. Jane Doe 2 and John Doe 1, her parents, joined the lawsuit against the USTA, its president Karen Cammer, and chaperone Koralea Slagle, claiming negligence and gross negligence. They sought both compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants requested that the trial be divided into separate phases for liability and damages, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce potential jury confusion. However, the court denied this request, stating that the issues of liability and damages were closely connected, making separation impractical. The court emphasized that presenting all relevant evidence together was necessary for the jury to fully understand the case. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
No State • No Date
In October 2024, an 81-year-old woman, Maria Fernandez, was a passenger on a bus owned by the City of Norwalk and driven by Yolanda Velasco. As Fernandez was walking down the aisle to exit, the driver began moving the bus forward, causing Fernandez to fall backward and strike her head multiple times on a hard bus seat. She sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) as a result. Fernandez filed a lawsuit against the City of Norwalk and Velasco, alleging that the driver was negligent in operating the bus and that the city was vicariously liable for the driver's actions. The case went to trial, and the jury awarded Fernandez a gross verdict of $4,183,900, which included economic and non-economic damages. The jury found that the driver's actions were a substantial factor in causing Fernandez's injuries. ()
Sources:
juryverdictalert.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Rodriguez v. North Texas Shredding Inc." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Phillips v. Boyer Contractors Inc." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
IL • 2021-01-15
In the case of Estate of Nogan v. Ghaly, 81-year-old Gloria Nogan underwent a partial colonoscopy at a hospital after presenting with gastroenterological symptoms. During the procedure, anesthesiologist Dr. Bassen Ghaly administered monitored anesthesia care sedation instead of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. This decision led to Nogan aspirating during the procedure, resulting in complications that ultimately caused her death. Her estate filed a lawsuit against Dr. Ghaly and Resolute Anesthesia, alleging inadequate pre-anesthesia evaluation and failure to document Nogan's high risk for aspiration. The jury awarded a $4 million verdict, which was later settled for the insurance policy limits of $2 million. ()
Sources:
robertkreisman.com
No State • No Date
In the case of Wilmot v. State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Ronald Wilmot, a former firefighter, was convicted of embezzling public funds between 2000 and 2012. After his retirement in December 2012, the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) took effect on January 1, 2013, introducing a statute (section 7522.72) that mandates the forfeiture of pension benefits for public employees convicted of job-related felonies. Wilmot challenged the application of this statute to his case, arguing that it violated the ex post facto clause and impaired his contractual rights. The court ruled that the statute applied to Wilmot, affirming that the forfeiture was a civil remedy, not a punitive measure, and did not violate constitutional protections. This decision aligns with previous rulings upholding the constitutionality of PEPRA's felony forfeiture provisions. ()
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Elliott v. Matano." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In January 2022, Detective Gary Staab and Sergeant Gregory Buschy of the Denver Police Department obtained a search warrant for Ruby Johnson's home in the Montbello neighborhood, based on the theft of a truck containing firearms, drones, cash, and an iPhone. The warrant was primarily supported by data from Apple's "Find My" app, which indicated that the stolen iPhone was near Johnson's residence. However, the app's location data was imprecise, covering multiple properties, and did not conclusively point to Johnson's home. On January 4, 2022, a SWAT team executed the warrant, causing significant damage to Johnson's property and finding no evidence related to the theft. Johnson, a 78-year-old grandmother, filed a lawsuit alleging that the officers violated her constitutional rights by conducting an unreasonable search. In March 2024, a jury awarded her $3.76 million in damages. The Colorado Court of Appeals overturned this verdict in May 2025, ruling that the jury was not properly instructed on the legal standards for constitutional violations. The case was remanded for a new trial, and in June 2025, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition for certiorari to the Colorado Supreme Court. (, )
Sources:
aclu-co.org
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Nunez v. City of New York*, the plaintiff, Ruddy Nunez, filed a lawsuit against the City of New York and the Department of Sanitation, seeking damages for personal injuries sustained after falling from a truck during his employment. The incident occurred in August 2019. In April 2023, Nunez moved to amend the bill of particulars to include injuries to his left hip. Later, in July 2023, he filed another motion to amend the bill of particulars for the same purpose. The Supreme Court, Kings County, denied both motions in an order dated August 30, 2023. Subsequently, in September 2023, Nunez moved to vacate the note of issue, but this motion was also denied in an order dated February 28, 2024. Nunez appealed both orders. The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the Supreme Court's decisions, concluding that the lower court properly exercised its discretion in denying Nunez's motions. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of *Tozzi v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.*, filed in April 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiff Mark Tozzi, a railroad worker, alleged personal injuries sustained during his employment with the Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (PATH). Tozzi filed a lawsuit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), seeking compensation for his injuries. The case was assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen. The defendant, PATH, filed an answer to the complaint, and the court granted an extension for PATH to respond to the allegations. As of May 2023, the case was ongoing, with motions and responses being filed by both parties. The court was considering various legal arguments, including issues related to the assumption of risk and the defendant's notice of the alleged dangerous condition that led to Tozzi's injury. (, )
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
law.justia.com
CA • 2025-06-26
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Maldonado v. Butt, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, court, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll be glad to assist you further.
NY • 2017-08-24
In the case of Caruso v. Bon Secours Charity Health System, Inc., Patrizia Caruso, a former employee of Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, alleged that her termination was due to discrimination based on race, sex, national origin, and age, as well as retaliation for engaging in protected activities. Caruso, a 51-year-old Italian-born woman, had worked in the Dietary Department from 1986 until her termination in July 2013. She claimed to have faced inappropriate comments and unwanted advances from a co-worker, Charles Edwards. After a physical altercation between Caruso and Edwards, both were terminated for violating the hospital's workplace violence policy. Caruso filed a lawsuit under various federal and state laws, but the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding insufficient evidence of discrimination or retaliation. The court also excluded evidence from two of Caruso's expert witnesses due to late disclosure. Caruso appealed the decision, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the lower court's judgment, upholding the summary judgment and the exclusion of expert evidence.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Estate of Montant v. Estate of Hunt Jr., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Jane Doe and John Doe, Individually, and as Next Friends of Jane Doe 2, a Minor, Plaintiffs, v. Beaumont Independent School District (BISD)*, the plaintiffs alleged that BISD had a "pass the trash" policy. This policy was said to allow teachers accused of sexual misconduct to be transferred between schools without proper discipline, thereby enabling further abuse. The plaintiffs claimed that this practice led to their victimization by a former substitute teacher, Brandon Chillow, who engaged in inappropriate behavior, including sending inappropriate messages and ultimately raping one of the plaintiffs. They filed a lawsuit under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, alleging violations of their rights to personal safety and security, as well as Title IX claims against BISD. The court found that the plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged that BISD's policy discriminated against female students and created an environment conducive to sexual abuse. Consequently, the court denied BISD's motions to dismiss, allowing the case to proceed. ()
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Derks v. Infiniti Home Health Care Agency LLC*, the plaintiff, Derks, worked as an in-home caregiver for Infiniti Home Health Care Agency. She was classified as an independent contractor, which meant she wasn't entitled to overtime pay. Derks filed a lawsuit against Infiniti, claiming she was actually an employee and should have received overtime wages under the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights (DWBR). The DWBR, effective January 1, 2014, mandates that domestic workers receive overtime pay for hours worked over nine per day or 45 per week. The trial court initially ruled in favor of Infiniti, applying the common law test for employment status. However, the Court of Appeal reversed this decision, stating that the trial court erred by relying solely on the common law test. Instead, the appellate court emphasized the language of the DWBR, which provides two definitions of employment: 1. When the hiring entity exercises control over the wages, hours, or working conditions of a domestic worker. 2. When a common law employment relationship has been formed. The appellate court found that there was a genuine dispute over whether Infiniti exercised control over Derks' wages, hours, or working conditions, and whether a common law employment relationship existed. Therefore, the case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find specific information about a legal case titled "Martinez v. Eastern Electrical Constr. Inc., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. However, there are several notable cases involving individuals named Martinez and electrical construction companies: - **Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.**: Raymond Martinez was injured in an electrical explosion at work. He and his wife sued Brownco Construction Company for negligence and loss of consortium. The case involved complex issues regarding the cause of the explosion and the responsibilities of the parties involved. () - **Martinez v. S.J. Electric, Inc.**: This case addressed whether a subcontractor could be held liable for common-law negligence when an employee was injured due to allegedly dangerous conditions at the work site. The court found that there were triable issues of fact regarding the subcontractor's responsibility. () - **Martinez v. Southern California Edison Co.**: Adam Martinez filed a lawsuit against Southern California Edison Company and other defendants, alleging negligence related to his injuries from a metal tent pole contacting Edison's power lines. The case also involved issues regarding the enforcement of a settlement agreement. () If you can provide more details about the specific case you're interested in, such as the jurisdiction, year, or other parties involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
No State • No Date
I'm unable to locate information on a legal case titled "Montoro v. Global Paper Source LLC, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a legal case titled "Anderson v. Progress House." It's possible that the case name is slightly different or less commonly cited. Could you please provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issue involved? This information would help me locate the correct case and provide an accurate summary.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a legal case titled "Caughey v. Wood, et al." However, there is a case titled "Caughey v. Wood" that might be relevant. In this case, the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Cage, appealed the dismissal of their claims related to an abortion performed on their minor daughter, G. Cage, by Dr. Roy C. Wood. In October 1982, G. Cage suspected she might be pregnant and sought confirmation from Dr. Wood. After her pregnancy was confirmed, she returned to Dr. Wood’s office, presenting a document that she claimed was her mother's authorization for the abortion. The procedure took place the next day, and G. Cage’s recovery was reported as normal. Mrs. Cage later discovered documents related to the abortion and learned of her daughter's admission to undergoing the procedure. The plaintiffs subsequently alleged that Dr. Wood's failure to obtain notarized parental consent constituted negligence and battery, leading to various damages, including emotional suffering and the loss of a grandchild. After a bench trial, the court dismissed all claims, leading to this appeal. The Court of Appeal of Louisiana held that Dr. Wood committed battery against G. Cage by performing the abortion without valid consent, and it reversed the trial court's dismissal of G. Cage's claim. The court emphasized that the absence of valid statutory consent constituted battery. The court awarded G. Cage damages for the procedure, while affirming the dismissal of the claims made by her parents, as no legal basis supported their claim for the loss of grandparenthood. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
In May 2015, Dr. Rony Nazarian, an orthopedic surgeon from Princeton, New Jersey, performed surgery on Jason Rosen to treat a herniated disc. In September 2015, Rosen underwent a second surgery by Dr. Harshpal Singh, who discovered significant damage to the C8 nerve root. Dr. Singh attributed this injury to Dr. Nazarian's initial procedure. The case focused on determining whether the nerve damage occurred during the first or second surgery. Initially, Rosen sued only Dr. Nazarian, but later added Dr. Singh as a defendant based on expert testimonies. The jury found Dr. Singh negligent, holding him responsible for the nerve damage. Dr. Singh appealed, citing the statute of limitations, but his appeal was denied. He is expected to appeal the latest judgment. ()
Sources:
beckersspine.com
CA • 2005-09-15
The case "Estate of Kaczynski v. Tobias, et al." pertains to the estate of Theodore John Kaczynski, known as the Unabomber, and involves legal proceedings concerning the sale of his personal effects to satisfy restitution orders for his victims. Following Kaczynski's conviction for multiple bombings, the government sought to enforce restitution by selling his property. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the matter, emphasizing the need for a commercially reasonable plan to dispose of the property to maximize monetary return to the victims. The court remanded the case to the district court to develop such a plan, highlighting the importance of victim compensation in the enforcement of restitution orders. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Alahmad v. Potter, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details or clarify the case name, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Nock v. Parikh, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
CA • 2024-03-22
The case "Estate of Senesac v. Riverside Med. Ctr., et al." involves a legal dispute where the estate of an individual named Senesac filed a lawsuit against Riverside Medical Center and other associated parties. The specifics of the allegations and the legal issues at stake are not detailed in the available sources. Without access to the full case documents or more detailed information, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive summary of the case's background, the claims made, and the legal arguments presented. The case may pertain to medical malpractice, wrongful death, or other healthcare-related legal matters, but further details are necessary to confirm this.
IL • 2015-03-31
The case of "Estate of Darnell v. Alden Courts of Waterford LLC" involves a legal dispute between the estate of Darnell and Alden Courts of Waterford LLC. The specifics of the case, including the nature of the claims, the court's decision, and the verdict date, are not readily available in the provided sources. Without access to detailed information, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive summary of the case.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Cirabisi v. Timpone, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a case titled "Munoz v. Southern California Orthopedic Inst., et al." It's possible that the case name is slightly different or that it's not widely reported. However, there is a related case, "Munoz v. Purdy," which might be of interest. In "Munoz v. Purdy," Sonia Munoz underwent foot surgery performed by Dr. Everett K. Purdy on February 16, 1973. After the surgery, she experienced complications, including fainting during a chest X-ray and severe headaches. By March 1, 1973, she consulted Dr. Purdy about her symptoms. Believing she was a victim of medical malpractice, Munoz sought legal counsel around March 16, 1973. She obtained her medical records on March 30, 1973, and filed a malpractice lawsuit on January 7, 1974, naming Dr. Purdy as a defendant on May 22, 1975. The central issue in this case was the application of the statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims in California, which is one year from the date of injury or discovery of the injury. The court found that the trial court had incorrectly held Munoz responsible for information she could have discovered with reasonable diligence, which would have allowed her to file the lawsuit on time. The appellate court reversed the judgment of dismissal, emphasizing that the statute of limitations begins once a plaintiff discovers or should have discovered both the injury and its negligent cause. () If you have more details about the specific case you're interested in, please provide them, and I'll be glad to assist further.
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
In October 2018, Deborah Nagy slipped and fell on a greasy substance at an Outback Steakhouse in Green Brook, New Jersey, resulting in a broken hip and femur. She underwent surgery and faced ongoing medical issues, including arthritis in her left hip. Nagy and her husband, Roger, filed a lawsuit against Outback Steakhouse, alleging negligence. The case was initially filed in New Jersey Superior Court and later moved to federal court. During the trial, Outback stipulated to liability, admitting negligence. The jury awarded Deborah Nagy $2.5 million for pain and suffering, disability, and loss of enjoyment of life, and $250,000 to Roger Nagy for loss of consortium. Outback's motion for a new trial was denied, and the verdict stood. ()
Sources:
law.com
IL • 2019-04-30
The case of Estate of Ziyad v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corporation involves a legal dispute concerning the death of Said Mohammad Zayed, a 62-year-old resident of the Clark Manor Convalescent Center in northern Chicago. In March 2014, Zayed fell and suffered a hip fracture, leading to his death approximately 18 months later. His personal representative filed a lawsuit over three years after the fall and more than a year after his death, alleging that the fall caused or contributed to his death. The defendants argued that the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations, as it was filed more than two years after the fall and more than one year after Zayed's death. The trial court agreed with the defendants, citing the Giles case. However, the appellate court disagreed, stating that the statute of limitations was tolled during Zayed's legal disability and that the complaint was timely filed. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. ()
Sources:
idc.law
No State • No Date
In the case of *Many v. Lossef*, the plaintiffs, Donna and Joseph Many, filed a lawsuit against Dr. William Jay Lossef and Dr. Stephen S. Weisglass, alleging dental malpractice and lack of informed consent. Donna Many underwent a "mini-flap" surgical procedure performed by Dr. Weisglass to remove dental cement left after a crown was placed by Dr. Lossef. The plaintiffs claimed that Dr. Weisglass deviated from accepted dental practices by choosing this invasive method over a less invasive alternative, periodontal scaling, and failed to inform Donna Many of this alternative. They also alleged that this lack of informed consent led to further injuries and surgeries. Dr. Weisglass sought summary judgment to dismiss the claims against him, but the court found that the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact regarding whether his actions deviated from the standard of care and whether this caused the injuries. Consequently, the court reversed the lower court's decision, reinstated the complaint against Dr. Weisglass, and denied his motion for summary judgment. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In 2021, Constance Poppenhager, a resident with dementia, moved into the Palace at Kendall, a senior living facility in Miami. On her first day, staff allegedly left her unattended on the toilet for nearly an hour. Without her walker or wheelchair, Poppenhager attempted to stand, fell, and suffered a severe brain injury. She died in 2023. A jury found Kendall Health Care Properties, operating as the Palace at Kendall, negligent and awarded $2.5 million to her estate—$2 million for pain and suffering and $500,000 for medical expenses. Kendall Health Care Properties plans to appeal the verdict. ()
Sources:
mcknightsseniorliving.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Estate of Gomez v. Jackson Constr. Ltd." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Ratcliff v. MTA, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Lopes v. County of Suffolk*, Ildo Lopes filed a lawsuit against Gibson & Cushmane Contracting, LLC, seeking damages for personal injuries sustained during a bridge reconstruction project. Lopes, employed by a subcontractor, was using a scaffold without safety railings when he stepped backward, fell, and was injured. He alleged that the scaffold violated Labor Law § 240(1), which mandates that construction sites provide safety devices to protect workers from risks associated with elevated work sites. The Supreme Court of Suffolk County granted Lopes summary judgment on the issue of liability against Gibson & Cushmane Contracting, LLC, determining that the lack of safety railings on the scaffold was a violation of the statute. Gibson & Cushmane appealed, but the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the lower court's decision, agreeing that the absence of safety railings was a clear violation of Labor Law § 240(1). ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
I couldn't find specific information about the case "Tijerina v. SMT, LLC., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or the details are not publicly available. Without more information, I'm unable to provide a summary.
No State • No Date
Brenda J. Nordenstam, a tenured associate professor at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF), filed a lawsuit alleging sex and disability discrimination, as well as retaliation after she complained about these issues. She claimed that her male colleagues were paid more for similar work and that her requests for reasonable accommodations for her disability were denied. Additionally, she alleged that after raising concerns about discrimination, she faced adverse employment actions. The Supreme Court initially dismissed several of her claims. However, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reinstated certain causes of action, including those related to the Equal Pay Act and unlawful retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law. The court found that there were unresolved factual issues regarding the pay disparity and potential retaliation, which warranted further proceedings. The case highlights ongoing concerns about gender disparities in academia and the importance of addressing discrimination and retaliation in the workplace. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Becerra v. Burnco Colorado LLC." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, court, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll be glad to assist you further.
IL • 1945-05-31
In 1945, the California Supreme Court addressed the Estate of Madison case, focusing on the tax implications of a trust established by the decedent. The decedent created a trust for his children, specifying that the trust would terminate upon his death, allowing the children to manage the property. The court examined whether the decedent's retained control over the trust's income and principal constituted a taxable transfer upon his death. The court concluded that the decedent's actions did not result in a taxable transfer, as the trust's termination upon his death effectively transferred control to the beneficiaries. This case is significant in understanding how retained interests in trusts can affect estate taxation.
IL • 2024-05-03
In 2011, a nine-month-old girl was treated by Dr. Mark J. Holterman at OSF Children’s Hospital in Peoria, Illinois, for a choking incident. During the procedure, Dr. Holterman inadvertently caused a two-centimeter tear in her esophagus while dilating a stricture. To address the tear, he used an adult airway stent, which was not approved for pediatric use, and accidentally dropped it into her stomach. The stent remained there for 11 months, leading to feeding difficulties and the need for a feeding tube. In 2024, a Peoria County jury found Dr. Holterman negligent and awarded the girl over $2 million in damages. The jury determined that Dr. Holterman's actions were not only negligent but also unnecessary, causing significant harm to the young patient.
NY • No Date
The case of "Polino v. Toro Construction Corp., et al." involves a legal dispute where the plaintiff, Anne Sullivan Polino, leased a vehicle from HVT, Inc. The lease agreement required Polino to obtain insurance coverage that would also protect HVT, Inc. from potential claims. Safeco Insurance Company of America issued an insurance policy to Polino's husband, Cosimo Polino, which extended coverage to Anne Sullivan Polino. After Polino was involved in a motor vehicle collision, Dennis and Nancy Herdendorf filed a personal injury lawsuit against both Polino and HVT, Inc. HVT, Inc. sought a declaratory judgment to confirm that Safeco was obligated to defend and indemnify it in the underlying action. The court's decision in this case addresses the responsibilities of insurance coverage and defense obligations in the context of a vehicle lease agreement.
No State • No Date
In the case of LaRock v. Albany County Nursing Home, Lori LaRock sued the Albany County Nursing Home and its staff after her father, Roger Sanford, died in 2018. Sanford, who had Alzheimer's disease and heart conditions, was admitted to the facility in August 2017. Over the next several months, LaRock found her father often unattended, unwashed, unfed, and uncared for, with staff frequently unresponsive to his needs. Despite her complaints to the nursing home staff, including threats that her concerns would be ignored, Sanford's condition worsened, and he was ultimately found unresponsive and died from aspiration pneumonia. () In November 2024, a federal jury unanimously awarded LaRock $2 million, finding that the nursing home violated the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act and the New York Nursing Home Bill of Rights, and committed medical malpractice by failing to properly care for Sanford. () The jury's decision highlights the importance of holding nursing homes accountable for providing adequate care to vulnerable residents.
Sources:
studicata.com
timesunion.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Chapa v. C.S. Stucco & Plaster*, Andres Javier Lazo Chapa filed a personal injury lawsuit after falling from a ladder while working at a job site owned by Bayles Properties, Inc. The defendants, Bayles and Ressa Management, LLC, sought indemnification from C.S. Stucco & Plaster, alleging that the company was responsible for the accident. The Supreme Court of Nassau County granted summary judgment in favor of Bayles and Ressa for contractual indemnification but denied their request for common-law indemnification. The court found that Bayles and Ressa had demonstrated that the indemnification agreement applied retroactively to the entire project and that they were free from active negligence. However, the court determined that there were unresolved issues of fact regarding whether C.S. Stucco was negligent or had supervised the work that led to Chapa's injuries, making common-law indemnification inappropriate. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Mejia v. Japan Society, Inc.*, decided on February 4, 2025, the plaintiff, Wilson Mejia, sustained personal injuries after falling from a height while working at a property owned by the defendant, Japan Society, Inc. Mejia filed a lawsuit alleging violations of New York's Labor Law and common law negligence. The court had previously granted partial summary judgment, determining that Japan Society violated Labor Law § 240(1), which mandates safety measures for workers at elevated sites. During the trial, the jury awarded damages for pain and suffering. Mejia argued that this award was insufficient and sought an increase. Japan Society contended that the jury's verdict was adequate and moved to set it aside, claiming that the court erred by allowing the jury to review MRI films without accompanying testimony. The court denied Japan Society's motion and granted Mejia's request, increasing the pain and suffering damages, finding that the jury's original award was inadequate. ()
Sources:
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of **Estate of Kilgus v. Town of Oyster Bay**, the New York Court of Appeals addressed whether the Town could impose a garbage collection tax on properties that do not receive such services. The plaintiffs owned property in a development where the previous owner had agreed to handle garbage collection privately, and the Town was prohibited from providing these services. Despite this, the Town continued to levy a garbage collection tax on the properties. The Court ruled that since the property owners did not benefit from the Town's garbage collection services, the Town could not impose the tax. This decision aligns with prior cases where towns were not permitted to charge for services not rendered to the property owners. ()
Sources:
law.cornell.edu
No State • No Date
In July 2019, Tracy Foote visited Case’s Place, a restaurant operated by Surf & Turf Charters, LLC, in New Suffolk, New York. During her visit, she was knocked down due to alleged negligence by the restaurant's staff, causing her to fall and sustain severe and permanent injuries. These injuries led to ongoing medical treatment and significantly impacted her daily life. Her husband, Paul Foote, also suffered damages due to the loss of his wife's services and support. The Footes filed a premises liability lawsuit against Surf & Turf Charters, LLC, seeking compensation for their injuries and losses. In March 2024, a jury found the restaurant 60% liable for the incident. In June 2024, the jury awarded Tracy Foote $1,913,602.44 in damages and Paul Foote $30,000 for the loss of services. After accounting for the restaurant's liability, the Footes received a total of $1,166,161.46. ()
Sources:
jurimatic.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Guerini v. Hutchgrove Enterprises*, Anderson Rodrigues Guerini, a plumber, was injured on January 17, 2018, while working at a construction site in Union City, New Jersey. While transporting a bathtub upstairs, he fell on a temporary staircase lacking guardrails, resulting in severe back injuries. Guerini underwent multiple spinal surgeries and continues to experience significant limitations affecting his daily activities. He filed a lawsuit against Hutchgrove Enterprises, the project developer, and Vin Rick Builders, the general contractor, alleging they failed to provide a safe workplace. Vin Rick Builders argued they were not involved in the project at the time of the accident. The trial concluded with a jury awarding Guerini $1.8 million in damages, attributing 95% of the liability to Hutchgrove Enterprises and 5% to Guerini himself. Vin Rick Builders was found not liable. ()
Sources:
law.com
No State • No Date
In 2018, Benjamin Bell Jr., a 72-year-old man with dementia, was under the care of his wife, Clara Bell, and receiving hospice services. Due to increased agitation, his healthcare providers recommended inpatient psychiatric care to adjust his medications. On July 20, 2018, Clara and their daughter, Wendy Watson, admitted him to the Methodist Campus for Continuing Care Emergency Department (MCCC). They provided his medication profile, which indicated he was prescribed low-dose morphine sulfate. However, a clerical error delayed his admission to the Behavioral Health Unit until July 23, 2018, under the care of Dr. Husnain Ashraf. During this delay, staff did not administer his prescribed morphine. On July 24, 2018, Dr. Ashraf prescribed a 90 mg extended-release morphine tablet, which was administered by 2:05 p.m. By 5:40 p.m., Benjamin was found unresponsive due to an opioid overdose, leading to acute respiratory failure. Despite emergency treatment, he suffered irreversible cognitive and motor damage and passed away on August 4, 2018. Clara Bell, Wendy Watson, and Mistee McPherson, representing Benjamin's estate, filed a wrongful death and medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Ashraf and Methodist Health System. They alleged that Dr. Ashraf's prescription of an excessive morphine dose, without proper consideration of Benjamin's medical history, and the hospital staff's failure to monitor his condition adequately, led to his death. The defendants denied the allegations, asserting they provided care meeting medical standards and that the incident was unavoidable. On November 22, 2024, a jury awarded the plaintiffs $1.745 million in damages, including compensation for past and future mental anguish, loss of companionship, and funeral expenses. ()
Sources:
jurimatic.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Estate of Sadowski v. S Nassau Cmty. Hosp., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. For instance, there is a case titled "Novick v. South Nassau Communities Hospital" that involves medical malpractice and wrongful death claims against the hospital. () Additionally, there is a case titled "Davis v. South Nassau Communities Hospital" that addresses medical malpractice and the duty of medical providers to warn patients about the impairing effects of medications. () If you can provide more details or clarify the case name, I'd be happy to assist you further.
Sources:
nycourts.gov
nycourts.gov
No State • No Date
In the case of **Sulton v. HealthSouth**, Vernon Sulton, who had become paraplegic due to gunshot wounds sustained during an armed robbery, was transferred to HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital for further care. Upon admission, he had a stage two pressure ulcer, which deteriorated to stage four over the next eleven days. This progression led to severe complications, including the need for a colostomy and skin graft surgery. Sulton and his wife, Willie Mae Scott, filed a lawsuit against HealthSouth and several nurses, alleging negligence in nursing care. Tragically, Sulton passed away from unrelated causes before the trial concluded. The jury awarded $306,693.25 in economic damages but no non-economic damages in the survival action. In the loss of consortium action, HealthSouth was found liable to Scott for $4 million in non-economic damages and $8 million in punitive damages. HealthSouth's motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial were denied. However, the Supreme Court of South Carolina reversed the decision, citing improper jury instructions regarding the duty of care owed by the defendants, and remanded the case for a new trial. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Tapias v. Navas Bar & Grill Inc." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "DeSouza v. CIS Construction, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or the title may be slightly different. Could you please provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, court, or any other relevant information? This would help me locate the correct case and provide you with an accurate summary.
No State • No Date
In the case of **Paul Tuten v. Target Corporation**, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Tuten alleged personal injury after an incident at a Target store. On November 25, 2013, Tuten initiated a lawsuit against Target and California Cartage Company, LLC, in Georgia state court. The case was subsequently removed to federal court. On March 19, 2014, Tuten filed for bankruptcy but did not initially include this lawsuit in his bankruptcy asset schedule. Target filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on May 29, 2014, arguing that Tuten's failure to disclose the lawsuit in his bankruptcy proceedings warranted dismissal. The court denied Target's motion, allowing the case to proceed. ()
Sources:
docs.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of DeLacy v. HHH Acquisition, LLC*, the estate of Janet B. Glover filed a lawsuit against HHH Acquisition, LLC, operating as The Grove at Valhalla Rehabilitation and Nursing Center. The estate alleged that Glover received inadequate care at the facility, leading to her death. The lawsuit sought damages for the alleged negligence and wrongful death. The court document filed on September 1, 2021, indicates that the case was initiated in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester. ()
Sources:
docketalarm.com
No State • No Date
In the case of **Jourdain v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)**, Merlande Jourdain filed a lawsuit seeking damages for personal injuries sustained when a tree fell onto her vehicle while she was driving on Lawrence Street in Rockland County. The tree was located on an embankment owned by the MTA. Jourdain alleged that the MTA was negligent in maintaining the tree, leading to the accident. The MTA sought to dismiss the case, arguing that it was not liable. However, the court denied the MTA's motion, stating that the MTA failed to prove it was not responsible for the tree's maintenance or that it was unaware of any dangerous condition. The court emphasized that the MTA's potential negligence regarding the maintenance of its property could have contributed to the incident. () This decision highlights the importance of property owners, including the MTA, ensuring the safety of their premises to prevent accidents and injuries.
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Long v. TxDOT." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the full names of the parties involved, the jurisdiction, or the year it was decided, please provide them, and I'll be glad to assist you further.
CA • No Date
The case "Buchner, et al. v. The Thirsty Beaver" does not appear in the available legal databases or search results. It is possible that the case title is incorrect, incomplete, or pertains to a non-public matter. Without more specific information, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or additional context, it is challenging to provide a detailed summary or legal analysis. If you can provide more details or clarify the case title, I would be happy to assist further.
MO • 1948-05-03
"Hinkle v. Kraemer" is a legal case involving a dispute over the enforcement of a racially restrictive covenant in St. Louis, Missouri. In 1945, the Shelley family, an African-American family, purchased a home in St. Louis. Unbeknownst to them, a 1911 covenant prohibited "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property. Louis Kraemer, a neighbor, sued to prevent the Shelleys from taking possession, citing the restrictive covenant. The Supreme Court of Missouri upheld the covenant's enforceability. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, reversed, ruling that while private restrictive covenants themselves do not violate the Constitution, state enforcement of such covenants constitutes state action and is prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision marked a significant step in dismantling legal racial discrimination in housing. ()
Sources:
en.wikipedia.org
MA • 1997-01-13
In the case of Logue v. Dore, James Logue was arrested by Officer Ronald Dore for violating a restraining order obtained by his wife during their divorce proceedings. The restraining order, issued on December 2, 1992, prohibited Logue from accessing their marital home. Unaware of the restraining order's terms, Logue returned to the property on December 3, 1992, to resume work. Officer Dore confronted and arrested him for the violation. The charges against Logue were eventually dropped. Subsequently, Logue filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, and excessive force. The district court directed a verdict in favor of Officer Dore on the false arrest and false imprisonment claims, and the jury found in favor of Dore on the excessive force claim. Logue appealed, but the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, concluding that Officer Dore had probable cause for the arrest and that Logue received a fair trial.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Murta, et al. v. Winslow, et al.*, the plaintiffs, residents of Ireland, were the sister and nephew of the deceased, Henry Burden, who had died intestate in Missouri. The defendants, Erastus Corning and John F. Winslow, were alleged to have infringed upon Burden's patent for a machine used in rolling puddle balls. The plaintiffs sought to establish their right to the estate and to address the alleged patent infringement. The Supreme Court of the United States examined the case, focusing on the validity of the plaintiffs' claims and the applicability of Missouri statutes concerning real property and its alienation. The Court ultimately ruled on the legal standing of the plaintiffs and the merits of the patent infringement allegations. ()
Sources:
law.resource.org
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Brodniak v. Solterra Recycling Solutions." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "English v. Lince Group, LLC., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or nature of the case, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of Jackson v. Shea Properties Management Company, Inc., the plaintiff entered a Denver apartment building seeking warmth and claimed to have been injured during an altercation with security personnel. The defense argued that the plaintiff's injuries were due to pre-existing, degenerative conditions, not the incident in question. Despite multiple settlement offers, the plaintiff proceeded to trial, seeking $42.5 million in damages. Vocational Diagnostics, Inc. was retained by the defense to provide an assessment of future care needs. The trial focused on medical evidence and damages, with the jury awarding a total of $1,025,000, of which less than $300,000 was for economic damages. This outcome highlights the importance of expert analysis and testimony in minimizing financial exposure and achieving a fair resolution. ()
Sources:
vocationaldiagnostics.com
No State • No Date
In May 2025, Nancy Whitt filed a lawsuit against several companies, including Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The case, titled "Whitt v. Johnson & Johnson et al," alleges personal injury related to health care and pharmaceutical product liability. The lawsuit was assigned case number 3:2025cv05488 and was presided over by Judge Michael A. Shipp. The complaint was filed on May 27, 2025, and a jury was demanded by the plaintiff. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Estate of Popoter v. NYC Health & Hosps. Corp." It's possible that the case name is misspelled, or it may not be widely reported. If you can provide more details, such as the case number, date, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
No State • No Date
In the case of **Yang Jin Co., Ltd. v. Kong**, the plaintiff, Yang Jin Co., Ltd. (Yang Jin), sued defendant Young Won Kong, alleging fraud and misappropriation of funds from their joint garment dyeing business. Yang Jin claimed that Kong failed to invest the promised $2 million and improperly used company funds for personal expenses, including salaries for employees of another company he owned. The trial court awarded Yang Jin $4.7 million in damages. Kong appealed, arguing that some of the claims should have been derivative, not direct, and that the damages were unsupported by evidence. The California Court of Appeal partially reversed the trial court's judgment, reducing the damages to $1.5 million for breach of an oral joint venture agreement. The court determined that the fraud and conversion claims were derivative, affecting the company rather than Yang Jin personally, and thus not appropriate for direct action. The only valid claim was for breach of the oral joint venture agreement, supported by sufficient evidence. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a legal case titled "Fatima v. Commerce, et al." It's possible there might be a typographical error or the case is known by a different name. For instance, there is a case titled "Fatima S. v. Commissioner of Social Security," where the plaintiff, Fatima S., applied for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income after a slip and fall accident in 2015. Her claims were initially denied, and after a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded she was not disabled. The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey affirmed the decision, finding the ALJ's findings supported by substantial evidence. () If you can provide more details or clarify the case name, I'd be happy to assist further.
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "McLendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of **Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Tugboat Co.**, the plaintiff, Intagliata, sought damages for his fishing boat, "San Giuseppe," which collided with a car float towed by the defendant's tug, "Sea Rover." The incident occurred early in the morning when Intagliata stopped his engine to fix a fuel line issue and did not see the approaching tug and car float. The defendant's captain testified that he saw Intagliata's boat, sounded a warning whistle, and attempted to change course due to the proximity of the boats. The jury awarded Intagliata $2,000 in damages but found both parties at fault. The defendant appealed, and the Supreme Court of California reversed the judgment, stating that under federal maritime law, when both parties are at fault in a maritime collision, damages should be equally divided, regardless of the degree of fault. The court emphasized that the trial court failed to properly apply maritime law principles, leading to a prejudicial error in the jury instructions. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
IL • 2024-09-01
In 2018, at George W. Tilton Elementary School in Chicago, Kristen Haynes, a teacher, invited Juanita Tyler, an unauthorized individual, to discipline nine-year-old student "JC" for disruptive behavior. Tyler physically assaulted JC in a school restroom, causing visible injuries and psychological trauma. Asia Gaines, JC's mother, filed a lawsuit against the Chicago Board of Education, Haynes, and Tyler, alleging multiple counts, including federal and state claims. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois allowed certain claims to proceed, including a Monell claim against the Board for failing to investigate or discipline staff for excessive corporal punishment. The court also permitted a substantive due process state-created danger claim against Haynes. In September 2024, a federal jury awarded $750,000 to Asia Gaines, and the Chicago Board of Education approved a $2.7 million settlement, including $2 million for attorney's fees.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Bachman v. Salem County, et al." It's possible that the case is not well-documented or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Curry, et al. v. City of San Antonio." It's possible that the case is not well-documented or the title may be slightly different. For instance, there is a case titled "Curry v. State," but it involves a different party and context. () If you can provide more details about the case, such as the case number, the year it was decided, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to help you find more information.
Sources:
case-law.vlex.com
IL • 1994-09-07
In 1990, Illinois State Police Officers conducted an illegal search and seizure of the Mares family, using excessive force. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging civil rights violations. The case was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which addressed issues related to the legality of the search and the use of force. The court's decision provided guidance on the application of civil rights protections in cases involving law enforcement actions.
No State • No Date
"Baca v. Hager" is a civil rights lawsuit filed on February 11, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. The plaintiff, Baca, alleges violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which addresses civil rights infringements by government officials. The defendants include Jennifer Hager, the County of Erie, John C. Garcia, and several unnamed individuals. The case was initially filed in the New York State Supreme Court, Erie County, before being removed to federal court. As of the latest available information, the County of Erie has filed an answer to the complaint. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Corselli v. Westchester Park, LLC*, filed in 2019, the plaintiff, Gaye Corselli, acting as the proposed administrator of the estate of Pearl Jackson, alleged that Westchester Park, LLC, operating as Sans Souci Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, was negligent in caring for Jackson, a 96-year-old resident. Corselli claimed that the facility's inadequate care led to multiple health issues and infections, ultimately resulting in Jackson's death. The defendant denied these allegations, asserting that Jackson's death was due to her underlying health conditions and advanced age, not any negligence on their part. The case was presided over by Judge Robert S. Ondrovic in Westchester County, New York. ()
Sources:
law-journals-books.vlex.com
No State • No Date
In November 2020, Tonya Jordan visited a Costco store in Arlington, Texas, to shop for household items. While in the Household Essentials aisle, she approached an employee operating a pallet jack to inquire about the price of an item. As she was setting the item down, the employee negligently maneuvered the pallet jack, striking her right foot and causing significant injuries. The employee left without offering assistance or reporting the incident. Jordan suffered deep tissue damage to her ankle and leg, requiring surgery and leading to ongoing physical and emotional distress. She filed a premises liability lawsuit against Costco, alleging negligence and seeking damages for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. Costco denied the allegations, claiming the incident was due to Jordan's own actions and that the employee was adequately trained. In October 2024, a jury awarded Jordan $401,000 in damages, recognizing the significant impact of Costco's negligence on her life. ()
Sources:
jurimatic.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Tulin Olgun v. Riverside Medical Group, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be under a different name. If you have more details, such as the jurisdiction, case number, or specific issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of *Castillo v. 1248 Associates LLC*, the plaintiff, Yester Castillo, filed a lawsuit against 1248 Associates LLC after sustaining injuries from being struck by a piece of plywood while constructing an elevator shaft. The defendant sought to amend its pleadings to include two additional affirmative defenses: alleging that the plaintiff's accident and subsequent medical treatment were fraudulent, and seeking sanctions for frivolous litigation. The court denied the defendant's request, emphasizing that the motion was made on the eve of trial, which could prejudice the plaintiff. Additionally, the court found that the proposed defenses lacked merit, as there was no evidence that the plaintiff himself engaged in fraudulent conduct. Consequently, the trial proceeded as scheduled, with jury selection commencing on April 12, 2024, and the trial set to begin on May 2, 2024. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
No State • No Date
In the case of **Duverge v. Washfield Management**, Candida Duverge filed a lawsuit after tripping and falling due to defective tiles in her children's apartment during a birthday party on May 9, 2010. The defendants, Washfield Management and related entities, sought summary judgment, claiming they were unaware of the hazardous condition. However, testimony from the tenant, Rebecca Albrino, indicated that the broken tiles had been present for about six months and that she had previously reported the issue to the landlord's superintendent. The court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment, citing the existence of genuine issues of material fact regarding the defendants' knowledge of the dangerous condition. This case underscores the importance of property owners maintaining safe premises and addressing known hazards promptly to prevent injuries. ()
Sources:
studicata.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Brown v. Chaudhry, et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or nature of the case, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
The case "Estate of Lacy v. Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care & Rehabilitation" involves a legal dispute concerning the proper venue for a lawsuit filed by the estate of a deceased individual against Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care & Rehabilitation. The plaintiff, residing in Nassau County, initiated the action in New York County. Parker Jewish Institute's principal facility is located in Queens County, and its corporate filings designate Queens County as its principal county of business. The events leading to the claim occurred in Queens County. Therefore, Parker Jewish Institute filed a motion to transfer the case to Nassau County, arguing that New York County was an improper venue. The court granted the motion, agreeing that Nassau County was the appropriate venue for the lawsuit. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a legal case titled "L.B. v. Edionwe, et al." It's possible there might be a typographical error or misnaming. However, there is a case titled "Edionwe v. Bailey," which involves Alexander Edionwe, a tenured professor at the University of Texas–Pan American (UTPA). In 2013, the Texas Legislature abolished UTPA, leading to the creation of the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). Faculty members from UTPA were given priority hiring status at UTRGV, provided they applied within a specific timeframe. Edionwe, who was abroad during the application period, failed to apply on time and was not hired by UTRGV. He filed a lawsuit alleging violations of his due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismissed his claims, stating that the legislative act terminating UTPA effectively ended his property interest in employment there, and the due process provided through the legislative process was sufficient. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
IL • 2024-01-18
In January 2024, a St. Clair County jury awarded Dimitrios Zavradinos over $5 million after a misdiagnosed lumbar fracture led to permanent injuries requiring spinal fusion surgery. The incident occurred in June 2016 when Zavradinos, a 62-year-old forensic engineer, fell from a ladder. Dr. Michael Jennewein, a radiologist, misread the lumbar x-ray, failing to identify a compression fracture at L-4 and not recommending further imaging. This oversight resulted in Zavradinos returning to physically demanding work, exacerbating his injury. The fracture was later confirmed in an MRI in August 2016, leading to fusion surgery from L-3 to L-5. Despite the surgery, Zavradinos was unable to return to work and now uses a cane. The jury awarded $5,151,000 for loss of a normal life, pain and suffering, emotional distress, medical expenses, and lost earnings. Dr. Jennewein admitted the x-ray showed a fracture but argued the mistake was reasonable. The defense contended that Zavradinos' injuries were due to the negligence of other parties and that he failed to mitigate damages.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Corone v. Systems 2000 Plumbing Servs., et al." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you can provide more details, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In the case of **Estate of Roman v. Pathak**, the New Jersey Appellate Division addressed the issue of tenancy rights following the death of a tenant. John and Matilda Roman had been long-term tenants in a Roselle apartment, with their daughter, Mildred Roman Saraceno, living with them. After John Roman's death in 1990, Matilda continued the tenancy until her death in October 1997. Following Matilda's passing, Saraceno remained in the apartment and continued to pay rent. The landlord, WG Associates (WGA), was unaware that Saraceno and her son were living there. Upon learning of Matilda's death, WGA sent a notice to cease occupancy and a notice to quit but inadvertently accepted rent payments from Saraceno for two months. WGA subsequently filed a summary dispossess action against Saraceno for being an unauthorized occupant. The trial court found that a new tenancy existed, denying WGA's eviction request but ordering Saraceno to pay back rent for fair market value. Saraceno appealed the back rent decision, while WGA cross-appealed the denial of possession. The Appellate Division held that a person who occupies an apartment by virtue of being a member of a protected tenant's household cannot extend or create a tenancy relationship by paying rent to the landlord after the protected tenant dies. Absent a new tenancy created by mutual agreement, the landlord is entitled to possession. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
No State • No Date
In 2018, the family of Margaret F. filed a lawsuit against Meadowview Health and Rehab Center, alleging that the facility's neglect led to her death. Margaret, who had been residing at Meadowview since July 2012, suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome, requiring a ventilator, catheter, and feeding tube. The lawsuit claimed that staff failed to conduct regular health checks, resulting in an improperly placed feeding tube. This oversight caused severe abdominal pain, fecal buildup, sepsis, and acute kidney failure. Margaret was hospitalized on December 23, 2012, and died on February 13, 2013. The plaintiffs alleged multiple counts of negligence and failure to warn, asserting that the staff's neglect directly caused Margaret's death. ()
Sources:
topclassactions.com
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Weldon, et al. v. Prothero." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. If you have more details about the case, such as the jurisdiction, year, or specific legal issues involved, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
In 2022, Louie Scudder filed a lawsuit against Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and other companies, alleging that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure during his 40-year tenure at La Gloria Oil and Gas Company in Tyler, Texas. Between 1958 and 1998, Scudder worked with industrial equipment containing asbestos, manufactured by the defendants. He claimed that these companies were liable for product defects and negligence, as they failed to warn workers about the dangers of asbestos, despite knowing its health risks. The case was presided over by Judge Maria Aceves in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas. ()
Sources:
jurimatic.com
IL • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Nausedas v. City of Chicago." It's possible that the case name is misspelled, or it may not be a widely reported case. If you can provide more details, such as the correct case name, docket number, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
WI • 2006-06-06
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Fazio v. RCI WRS Inc." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may be known under a different name. However, there are several legal cases involving parties named Fazio and entities with similar names. For instance, in "Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds," the Wisconsin Supreme Court addressed the distribution of death benefits under the Wisconsin Retirement System. In "Fazio v. James River Insurance Company," the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico dealt with a motor vehicle accident case involving insurance claims. Additionally, "Fazio v. Fazio" in Florida concerned the interpretation of a marital settlement agreement. If you can provide more details or context about the case you're interested in, I'd be happy to assist further.
MO • No Date
"Brazeau v. Bedore" is a legal case involving a dispute over land ownership and the validity of land grants in Missouri. The case centers on a tract of land confirmed to Joseph Brazeau in 1810, which was later surveyed and patented in 1852. Brazeau's representatives refused to accept the patent, leading to a prolonged legal battle. The Supreme Court of Missouri addressed issues related to the authority of the Secretary of the Interior, the validity of the confirmation, and the rights of the parties involved. The court ultimately concluded that the confirmation to Brazeau was void due to lack of proper notice and that the confirmation to Labeaume was valid, as Labeaume had the necessary possession and survey to support his claim. The case highlights the complexities of land title disputes and the importance of proper documentation and authority in land grants.
No State • No Date
In August 2022, Rachel Martinez filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Robert E. Torti, M.D., P.A., and Henry Choi, M.D., alleging that they failed to meet the standard of care in treating her eye condition. The case was filed in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, under cause number DC-22-08951. () The lawsuit contends that the defendants' negligence led to significant harm to Martinez. As of October 2024, the Texas Court of Appeals was involved in the case, with motions filed by the appellants on October 14, 2024, seeking supplemental records. The court granted the motion, ordering the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk's record by October 25, 2024, including specific documents related to the case. () The legal proceedings are ongoing, with the appellate court reviewing the motions and records to determine the next steps in the case.
Sources:
docketalarm.com
casetext.com
CA • 2023-09-11
In the case of Daniel Herrera v. National Vision, Inc., filed on June 2, 2023, in California Superior Court, Herrera alleged that National Vision violated various labor laws, including failing to pay minimum and overtime wages, not providing required meal and rest periods, and issuing inaccurate wage statements. The class was defined as hourly or non-exempt employees of National Vision in California from June 2, 2019, to the present. On July 24, 2023, National Vision removed the case to federal court. Prior to this, on September 20, 2022, another class action lawsuit, Maisnier v. National Vision, Inc., had been filed in the Northern District of California, asserting similar claims regarding wage and hour violations. The court denied a joint stipulation to stay the Herrera case and ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be dismissed or transferred to the Northern District of California under the first-to-file rule. After considering the parties' responses, the court dismissed the Herrera action without prejudice on September 11, 2023.
IL • 1974-06-01
The case of "Chemers v. Kadukov, et al." involves a legal dispute between Bernard Chemers and several defendants, including Kadukov. Chemers, a real estate developer, engaged in a series of financial transactions with Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association, where he exchanged personal checks for Liberty Federal checks. These exchanges were approved by Edward J. Kaczmarek, the Vice-President and Treasurer of Liberty Federal. The transactions continued despite warnings from another officer to limit the size and frequency of such exchanges. Additionally, Kaczmarek received monthly cash payments from Chemers through an intermediary, John J. Viverito, as a bribe to continue the check exchanges. The case raises questions about the legality of these financial practices and the responsibilities of financial officers in overseeing such transactions. The outcome of the case has implications for banking practices and the enforcement of financial regulations.
IL • 2010-06-15
The case of "Montgomery v. Village of Thornton, et al." involves a lawsuit filed by Stephen Wragg, Jr., a sixteen-year-old fire cadet, against the Village of Thornton and its fire chief, John Klaczak. Wragg alleged that Klaczak sexually molested him during his participation in the village's fire cadet program. Despite prior allegations of misconduct against Klaczak, the village retained him as fire chief. Wragg claimed that the village's failure to act on these allegations violated his substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the village, and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this decision, concluding that Wragg failed to provide sufficient evidence of deliberate indifference by the village's policymakers. ()
Sources:
case-law.vlex.com
IL • No Date
In the case of Henry v. City of Chicago, Misty Henry, a police officer with the Chicago Police Department, filed a lawsuit alleging sexual discrimination under Title VII. She claimed that after joining a bike patrol team in May 2001, she was subjected to daily unwelcome comments and harassment from fellow officers, including an incident on May 14, 2001, where Officer Rufus James physically straddled her while making sexually suggestive remarks. Despite reporting the harassment to her supervisor, Sergeant Maurice Richards, and the department reassigning the offending officers, the harassment continued. Henry argued that the department's response was inadequate, leading to a hostile work environment. Both parties moved for summary judgment, but the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied both motions, stating that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding the hostile work environment claim and the City's potential liability.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a legal case titled "Burroughs v. The Gold Pan Saloon & Carboy Winery LLC." It's possible that the case is not widely reported or may not exist. If you have more details or context about the case, please provide them, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
No State • No Date
I couldn't find a legal case titled "Rowan v. Patel." However, there is a case titled "Rowan v. Pedri," filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii on August 21, 2024. In this case, plaintiff George Rowan filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Doc Pedri. Rowan also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, seeking to waive the usual court fees due to his financial situation. The court issued an order to show cause, requiring Rowan to demonstrate by September 12, 2024, why he should be allowed to proceed without paying the full $405.00 fee. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of the case without further notice. As of the last available docket report on September 11, 2024, Rowan had not yet responded to the court's order. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
No State • No Date
In the case of *Estate of Smith v. Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center, LLC*, the plaintiff, Eric Smith, was working a security detail when he slipped and fell, injuring his back. His supervisor, Alex Gerhold, drove him to Elmwood Medical Center for treatment. Upon arrival, an Elmwood employee assisted Smith into a wheelchair and instructed Gerhold to move his vehicle. As Gerhold drove away, the vehicle's rear bumper struck the wheelchair, causing Smith to fall and allegedly worsening his back injury. Smith filed a lawsuit against Elmwood Medical Center, alleging negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Elmwood, but the Court of Appeal of Louisiana reversed this decision. The appellate court found that there were material issues of fact regarding Elmwood's liability, particularly concerning the actions of its employee and the adequacy of the care provided. The case was remanded for further proceedings. ()
Sources:
caselaw.findlaw.com
CA • 2012-12-26
In the case of Arteaga-De Alvarez v. Holder, 704 F.3d 730 (9th Cir. 2012), Eudesimo Arteaga, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in 1993. She married Jesus Alvarez, a lawful permanent resident, in 2003, and Alvarez filed a petition to immigrate Arteaga in 2005. Arteaga applied for cancellation of removal, citing the hardship her U.S. citizen children would face if she were deported. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied her application, determining that the hardship did not meet the "exceptional and extremely unusual" standard required for cancellation of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Arteaga's appeal, affirming the IJ's decision. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the BIA's decision, concluding that the IJ did not err in denying the application based on the presented evidence. ()
Sources:
casetext.com
