Illinois Verdicts
IL • 2024-03-28
In 2020, a 13-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old male patient at Pavilion Behavioral Health System in Champaign, Illinois. The victim's mother filed a lawsuit alleging negligence, claiming the facility failed to prevent the assault by housing the patients in close proximity and lacking adequate supervision. In March 2024, a jury awarded $535 million in damages, comprising $60 million in compensatory and $475 million in punitive damages. Pavilion Behavioral Health System, a subsidiary of Universal Health Services (UHS), contested the verdict, describing it as unprecedented for a single-plaintiff injury case in Champaign County. In October 2024, the trial court reduced the punitive damages from $475 million to $120 million, resulting in a total award of $180 million. Pavilion intends to appeal the remaining judgment, and the plaintiff has 21 days to accept or refuse the reduced punitive damages.
IL • 2024-04-10
In 2018, Kove IO, Inc., a Chicago-based tech company, filed a lawsuit against Amazon Web Services (AWS), alleging that AWS's cloud storage services, including Amazon S3 and DynamoDB, infringed on three of Kove's patents related to scalable cloud storage technology. The patents in question are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,814,170; 7,103,640; and 7,233,978. In April 2024, a federal jury in Chicago found that AWS had infringed all three patents and awarded Kove $525 million in damages. AWS plans to appeal the verdict, asserting that the patents are invalid. Kove's CEO, John Overton, emphasized the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and the role of innovation in the tech industry. ()
Sources:
kove.com
IL • 1986-11-05
In the case of Spicer v. City of Chicago, William R. Spicer filed a lawsuit against the City of Chicago and other defendants, seeking a temporary restraining order and other injunctive relief. The Circuit Court of Cook County dismissed his complaint, and Spicer appealed the decision. The Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirmed the dismissal, stating that the trial court did not err in denying the request for injunctive relief and granting the motion to dismiss. The court's decision was filed on November 5, 1986.
IL • 2023-01-11
In January 2023, the Illinois Appellate Court reviewed the case of Bland v. Q-West, Inc., where Logan Bland sued Q-West, the owner of Q Bar, for negligence after sustaining a permanent spinal cord injury during an altercation with bar employees. The jury awarded Bland over $51 million, reduced by 20% for contributory negligence, resulting in a net award of approximately $41 million. Q-West appealed, arguing errors in jury instructions and the denial of its motion to amend affirmative defenses to include self-defense. The appellate court found merit in these arguments, reversed the trial court's decision, and remanded the case for a new trial.
IL • 2024-12-22
In December 2024, a Cook County jury awarded $66 million to the family of Idalia Corcoles, a 39-year-old Chicago mother of four, who died from complications following a liposuction procedure at the 63rd Medical and Surgical Center. The lawsuit alleged that Dr. Ayoub Sayeg, the surgeon responsible, failed to perform a thorough pre-surgical examination, did not obtain necessary medical clearance, and negligently conducted the surgery, leading to internal bleeding and a perforated abdominal wall. Furthermore, Dr. Sayeg admitted to not monitoring Corcoles post-operatively, resulting in her death from blood loss. This verdict stands as one of the largest known judgments in Cook County against a plastic surgeon and potentially the highest in Illinois for medical malpractice. ()
Sources:
hoodline.com
IL • 2024-09-10
Marcel Brown, an 18-year-old recent high school graduate, was arrested on September 3, 2008, four days after a shooting in a Chicago park that resulted in another teenager's death. Police theorized that Marcel's 15-year-old cousin fired the fatal shot and that Marcel was accountable for driving his cousin to and from the park. After arresting Marcel at his home, police confined him in a windowless room for 34 hours and interrogated him until he made untrue inculpatory statements, which were the sole basis for his first-degree murder conviction and 35-year sentence. The lengthy and intense interrogation was a textbook example of how to make an innocent teenager confess to something he did not do. On July 12, 2018, the State declined to appeal and dropped all charges, leading to Marcel's release after a decade of wrongful imprisonment. In June 2019, Marcel filed a civil rights lawsuit against the City of Chicago, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. In September 2024, a jury awarded Marcel $50 million, setting a record for the highest amount awarded to a single person in a wrongful conviction case in the U.S.
IL • 2022-06-02
In the case of Pierce v. Cherukuri, Susan Pierce filed a medical malpractice lawsuit on behalf of her husband, Craig, against Dr. Sudha Cherukuri and several Fresenius entities in Cook County, Illinois. Craig had received treatment for atrial fibrillation and subsequent dialysis care from the defendants, alleging that negligent care led to a stroke that impaired his abilities. The defendants sought to transfer the case to McDonough County under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, arguing that the alleged negligent acts occurred there and that many potential witnesses were located in or near McDonough County. The circuit court denied their motions to transfer, leading to an interlocutory appeal by the defendants. The appellate court ultimately affirmed the circuit court's decision, concluding that the defendants had not shown that the balance of relevant factors strongly favored a transfer.
IL • 2024-02-29
Antonio DeAngelo, a landscaper from Hoffman Estates, Illinois, suffered a debilitating stroke in 2015 after his physician at Advocate Physician Partners failed to properly assess and treat his elevated blood pressure. Despite presenting with symptoms indicating hypertension, the physician misdiagnosed him with bronchitis and did not address his high blood pressure. Approximately four weeks later, DeAngelo experienced a hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in permanent disabilities, including difficulty walking, speaking, and performing daily activities. In February 2024, a Cook County jury awarded DeAngelo a $39.9 million verdict, marking the highest reported award for a stroke-related lawsuit in Illinois. The jury found that the physician's negligence directly led to DeAngelo's stroke and subsequent disabilities. ()
Sources:
chicago.suntimes.com
IL • 2024-07-26
In 2024, a Chicago jury awarded $24.4 million to Cipriano Ramirez and his wife, Maria, in a lawsuit against Avon Products, Inc. Ramirez, a former janitor at Avon's Morton Grove, Illinois facility in the 1980s, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2023. The plaintiffs argued that his illness resulted from exposure to asbestos-contaminated talcum powder processed and manufactured at the facility. The jury found Avon liable for Ramirez's cancer diagnosis, rejecting the company's defense that other factors contributed to his illness. The case highlights the risks associated with asbestos in talc products and underscores the importance of corporate accountability for worker safety.
IL • 2024-05-01
In January 2017, Alexis Willis presented to Advocate Trinity Hospital in Chicago with decreased fetal movement. Despite signs indicating fetal distress, the medical team failed to perform a timely cesarean section. Approximately 25 minutes before delivery, the baby's heart rate dropped and did not recover, leading to hypoxic-ischemic brain damage and cerebral palsy. In May 2024, a Cook County jury unanimously found the hospital's staff negligent and awarded $23,070,000 to the child, Na'Jai Johnson, to cover her lifetime medical expenses.
IL • 2024-09-26
In the case of Amor v. Cross et al., William Amor was accused of arson following a fire that resulted in his mother-in-law's death. The Naperville Police Department, including Detectives Cross and Guerrieri, investigated the incident. Amor was arrested on a failure-to-appear warrant and, upon release, was transported to John Reid & Associates for a polygraph test. During the interrogation, Amor was provided with false information, leading to a coerced confession. He was initially convicted based on this confession, but the conviction was later vacated, and he was acquitted in a retrial. Amor filed a civil rights lawsuit against the detectives and John Reid & Associates, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The court held that the defendants could be held liable under § 1983 for their involvement in the coercive interrogation and that the voluntariness of Amor's confession was a matter for a jury to decide.
IL • 2024-03-08
In 2016, Omotola Oyedapo, 33 weeks pregnant, was transported by ambulance to the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) due to severe abdominal pain and low blood pressure. Paramedics notified the hospital of a potential obstetric emergency, but upon arrival, UCMC failed to promptly assess the fetal heart rate. The first check occurred 40 minutes later, revealing a dangerously low rate. Despite this, the hospital delayed the emergency delivery by over an hour. The child, Oluwasemilore "Praise" Oyedapo, was born with severe brain injuries, resulting in blindness, quadriplegic cerebral palsy, and total dependence for daily activities. Praise lived in this condition until his death in December 2020. In March 2024, a Cook County jury unanimously found UCMC liable for the wrongful death, awarding over $14 million in damages to the estate. The jury determined that the hospital's negligence in delaying the delivery directly caused Praise's injuries and subsequent death.
IL • 2023-02-01
In July 2017, Adelaida Anderson, a standup forklift operator at a FedEx warehouse in Effingham, Illinois, fell from her forklift after hitting a bump, resulting in her leg being run over and necessitating amputation. She filed a lawsuit against The Raymond Corporation, alleging the forklift was defectively designed. A key issue was the exclusion of expert testimony from Dr. John Meyer, who suggested that installing a door to enclose the operating compartment could have prevented the accident. The district court ruled this testimony inadmissible, leading to a jury verdict in favor of Raymond. Anderson appealed, and the Seventh Circuit Court found the exclusion of Meyer's testimony to be a significant error, potentially affecting the jury's decision, and remanded the case for a new trial.
IL • 2024-04-26
In July 2018, Jeremy Dutton, a tractor-trailer driver, was rear-ended by a pickup truck owned by Foltz Welding, Ltd. on I-70 in Illinois. The collision caused Dutton to experience significant neck and back pain, leading to a diagnosis of a cervical syrinx—a fluid-filled cavity in the spinal cord. Despite initial delays in seeking medical treatment, Dutton underwent surgery in April 2019 to address the syrinx and related spinal issues. However, he continues to suffer from daily neuropathic pain. Foltz Welding admitted negligence for the collision but contested the link between the accident and Dutton's injuries, citing the minor impact and the delay in medical attention. After a trial in April 2024, a Fayette County jury awarded Dutton $12.2 million for his past and future pain and suffering, medical expenses, and lost earnings. ()
Sources:
salvilaw.com
IL • 1972-04-14
In 1971, Melvin Heston, a railroad brakeman, sustained injuries after falling from a boxcar while working for the Chicago and North Western Railway Company. He filed a lawsuit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). During a pre-trial conference on November 16, 1971, both parties agreed to a $25,000 settlement, which Heston accepted in the presence of his attorneys and a magistrate. However, after the defendant sent the necessary releases for Heston to sign, he refused to execute them. The defendant then filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that the case had been settled. Heston contended that the settlement was invalid due to a mutual mistake of fact regarding his medical condition at the time of the settlement. The court held that the oral settlement was valid and enforceable, granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The court reasoned that both parties were aware of the permanent nature of Heston's injuries at the time of the settlement, and any alleged mistake was related to the future effects of known injuries, which did not affect the validity of the agreement. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
IL • 2024-02-28
In February 2024, a Tazewell County Circuit Court jury awarded over $10 million to Ronald Jacobs and his wife, Brenda, in a medical malpractice case against OSF St. Francis Medical Center in Peoria, Illinois. Ronald Jacobs, 66, was admitted to the hospital in November 2020 with sudden back pain. A CT scan revealed a significant lesion at the T11 vertebra, but an MRI was delayed due to his inability to remain still. During this delay, his condition deteriorated, leading to paraplegia. The hospital admitted fault three weeks before the trial. The jury awarded $8 million for pain, suffering, and loss of a normal life, and $1 million to Brenda for loss of consortium. The total award was $10,004,537.98, marking the second-highest verdict in Tazewell County history. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to tax prejudgment interest, potentially increasing the judgment to over $11.6 million.
IL • 2024-06-15
In the case of Srebrov v. Alexian Brothers Ambulatory Group, Simeon Srebrov visited an urgent care center complaining of coughing and shortness of breath. Dr. Celeste Galizia diagnosed him with rapid atrial fibrillation and prescribed metoprolol and an antibiotic, advising him to follow up with his primary care physician. Srebrov later suffered a stroke, resulting in permanent brain and motor deficits. He filed a lawsuit against Dr. Galizia and Alexian Brothers Ambulatory Group, alleging that Dr. Galizia failed to take a thorough medical history and did not prescribe anticoagulation therapy with a rapidly acting oral anticoagulant. A Cook County, Illinois jury awarded Srebrov a $9.35 million verdict in his favor.
IL • 2024-09-12
In 2018, 67-year-old Deborah Giorno from Ingleside, Illinois, experienced worsening fatigue, shortness of breath, and chest heaviness over a 16-month period. Despite these symptoms and diagnostic evidence indicating a deteriorating aortic valve, her healthcare providers at Advocate Medical Group failed to refer her for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. As a result, Giorno passed away on March 28, 2018, just one week before the scheduled procedure. In September 2024, a Cook County jury awarded her family an $8 million verdict, including $2.4 million for grief and mental suffering. The court added $1.53 million in pre-judgment interest, bringing the total to $9.53 million. ()
Sources:
cliffordlaw.com
IL • 2021-01-15
In the case of Estate of Nogan v. Ghaly, 81-year-old Gloria Nogan underwent a partial colonoscopy at a hospital after presenting with gastroenterological symptoms. During the procedure, anesthesiologist Dr. Bassen Ghaly administered monitored anesthesia care sedation instead of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. This decision led to Nogan aspirating during the procedure, resulting in complications that ultimately caused her death. Her estate filed a lawsuit against Dr. Ghaly and Resolute Anesthesia, alleging inadequate pre-anesthesia evaluation and failure to document Nogan's high risk for aspiration. The jury awarded a $4 million verdict, which was later settled for the insurance policy limits of $2 million. ()
Sources:
robertkreisman.com
IL • No Date
In 2018, Crispiniana Domingo filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Erica Williams, Monika Ann Martinez, and Justin Wooden in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case was assigned the number 1:2018cv04653 and was filed on July 5, 2018. The nature of the suit was categorized as "Civil Rights: Other," but specific details regarding the allegations and the court's decision are not available in the provided sources. The case was presided over by Judge John Robert Blakey. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
IL • 2023-04-07
Mill Creek Country Club, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, L.P., Premier Golf Management, Inc., and Premier Golf EAGL G.P., LLC, alleging that Evergreen Alliance failed to properly maintain the Mill Creek Golf Course during their lease term. The lease, initiated in October 2018, required Evergreen Alliance to upkeep the course and return it in good condition. However, upon Evergreen Alliance's surrender of the course in December 2018, Mill Creek Country Club discovered significant property damage, negligence, and general failure to maintain the course as stipulated in the lease. The case primarily revolves around the condition of the golf course at the time of its return and the responsibilities of Evergreen Alliance under the lease agreement.
IL • 2001-09-14
In the case of Barbosa v. Northeastern Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, the plaintiff, Rachel Barton, filed a lawsuit against the defendants, Chicago & North Western Transportation Company (now known as the Union Pacific Railroad Company) and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (NIRCRC). Barton alleged that she was dragged by a train due to the defendants' failure to implement proper procedures to ensure that passengers were not caught in the train's doors before departure. The trial court found the defendants liable for the claims brought against them. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, emphasizing the importance of the defendants' duty to passengers and the necessity of proper safety measures. ()
Sources:
illinoiscourts.gov
IL • 2015-03-31
The case of "Estate of Darnell v. Alden Courts of Waterford LLC" involves a legal dispute between the estate of Darnell and Alden Courts of Waterford LLC. The specifics of the case, including the nature of the claims, the court's decision, and the verdict date, are not readily available in the provided sources. Without access to detailed information, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive summary of the case.
IL • 2019-04-30
The case of Estate of Ziyad v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corporation involves a legal dispute concerning the death of Said Mohammad Zayed, a 62-year-old resident of the Clark Manor Convalescent Center in northern Chicago. In March 2014, Zayed fell and suffered a hip fracture, leading to his death approximately 18 months later. His personal representative filed a lawsuit over three years after the fall and more than a year after his death, alleging that the fall caused or contributed to his death. The defendants argued that the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations, as it was filed more than two years after the fall and more than one year after Zayed's death. The trial court agreed with the defendants, citing the Giles case. However, the appellate court disagreed, stating that the statute of limitations was tolled during Zayed's legal disability and that the complaint was timely filed. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings. ()
Sources:
idc.law
IL • No Date
The case of "Brown, et al. v. Metra" involves a lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs against the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, commonly known as Metra. The plaintiffs allege that Metra's actions or negligence led to their injuries or damages. Specific details about the nature of the claims, the events leading to the lawsuit, and the legal arguments presented are not readily available in the provided sources. Metra, as a public corporation operating train services throughout Northeast Illinois and parts of Wisconsin, has been involved in various legal cases concerning employee injuries, discrimination, and other matters. However, without more specific information about "Brown, et al. v. Metra," it is challenging to provide a detailed summary of this particular case.
IL • 1945-05-31
In 1945, the California Supreme Court addressed the Estate of Madison case, focusing on the tax implications of a trust established by the decedent. The decedent created a trust for his children, specifying that the trust would terminate upon his death, allowing the children to manage the property. The court examined whether the decedent's retained control over the trust's income and principal constituted a taxable transfer upon his death. The court concluded that the decedent's actions did not result in a taxable transfer, as the trust's termination upon his death effectively transferred control to the beneficiaries. This case is significant in understanding how retained interests in trusts can affect estate taxation.
IL • 2024-05-03
In 2011, a nine-month-old girl was treated by Dr. Mark J. Holterman at OSF Children’s Hospital in Peoria, Illinois, for a choking incident. During the procedure, Dr. Holterman inadvertently caused a two-centimeter tear in her esophagus while dilating a stricture. To address the tear, he used an adult airway stent, which was not approved for pediatric use, and accidentally dropped it into her stomach. The stent remained there for 11 months, leading to feeding difficulties and the need for a feeding tube. In 2024, a Peoria County jury found Dr. Holterman negligent and awarded the girl over $2 million in damages. The jury determined that Dr. Holterman's actions were not only negligent but also unnecessary, causing significant harm to the young patient.
IL • No Date
In May 2024, Admiral Indemnity Company filed a lawsuit against Lakeview Commons Townhomes Condominium Association and Idil Ozer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case, numbered 1:2024cv04294, involves a contractual dispute related to insurance. The initial status hearing was scheduled for August 6, 2024, with a joint initial status report due by July 30, 2024. As of July 9, 2024, the defendant, Idil Ozer, had filed an answer to the complaint, and attorney appearances were entered on her behalf. ()
Sources:
dockets.justia.com
IL • 2024-09-01
In 2018, at George W. Tilton Elementary School in Chicago, Kristen Haynes, a teacher, invited Juanita Tyler, an unauthorized individual, to discipline nine-year-old student "JC" for disruptive behavior. Tyler physically assaulted JC in a school restroom, causing visible injuries and psychological trauma. Asia Gaines, JC's mother, filed a lawsuit against the Chicago Board of Education, Haynes, and Tyler, alleging multiple counts, including federal and state claims. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois allowed certain claims to proceed, including a Monell claim against the Board for failing to investigate or discipline staff for excessive corporal punishment. The court also permitted a substantive due process state-created danger claim against Haynes. In September 2024, a federal jury awarded $750,000 to Asia Gaines, and the Chicago Board of Education approved a $2.7 million settlement, including $2 million for attorney's fees.
IL • 1994-09-07
In 1990, Illinois State Police Officers conducted an illegal search and seizure of the Mares family, using excessive force. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging civil rights violations. The case was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which addressed issues related to the legality of the search and the use of force. The court's decision provided guidance on the application of civil rights protections in cases involving law enforcement actions.
IL • 2024-01-18
In January 2024, a St. Clair County jury awarded Dimitrios Zavradinos over $5 million after a misdiagnosed lumbar fracture led to permanent injuries requiring spinal fusion surgery. The incident occurred in June 2016 when Zavradinos, a 62-year-old forensic engineer, fell from a ladder. Dr. Michael Jennewein, a radiologist, misread the lumbar x-ray, failing to identify a compression fracture at L-4 and not recommending further imaging. This oversight resulted in Zavradinos returning to physically demanding work, exacerbating his injury. The fracture was later confirmed in an MRI in August 2016, leading to fusion surgery from L-3 to L-5. Despite the surgery, Zavradinos was unable to return to work and now uses a cane. The jury awarded $5,151,000 for loss of a normal life, pain and suffering, emotional distress, medical expenses, and lost earnings. Dr. Jennewein admitted the x-ray showed a fracture but argued the mistake was reasonable. The defense contended that Zavradinos' injuries were due to the negligence of other parties and that he failed to mitigate damages.
IL • 2000-12-01
In December 2000, Debra L. Bachman and Danielle L. Bachman filed a lawsuit against General Motors Corporation, Uftring Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., Delphi Automotive Systems, and Delco Electronic Systems. The plaintiffs alleged that Danielle's 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier's airbag deployed unexpectedly, causing a collision with an oncoming van. They claimed the airbag system was defective and that the defendants failed to warn consumers about the issue. After a jury trial, the court ruled in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed, raising several issues, including the admissibility of certain evidence and the jury's verdict. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding no reversible errors. ()
Sources:
illinoiscourts.gov
IL • No Date
I couldn't find any information on a case titled "Nausedas v. City of Chicago." It's possible that the case name is misspelled, or it may not be a widely reported case. If you can provide more details, such as the correct case name, docket number, or specific issues involved, I'd be happy to assist you further.
IL • 2025-06-30
Salvatore Ziccarelli, a former corrections officer with the Cook County Sheriff's Office, began using intermittent Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave in 2011 to manage his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In July 2016, his condition worsened, prompting him to seek an eight-week treatment program. By September 2016, he had utilized 304 of his 480 hours of annual FMLA leave. To pursue the treatment, Ziccarelli contacted Wylola Shinnawi, the Sheriff's Office's FMLA coordinator, to discuss combining FMLA leave with other leave types. The details of their conversation are disputed; Ziccarelli alleges that Shinnawi discouraged him from taking additional FMLA leave, warning of potential discipline. Following this interaction, Ziccarelli resigned on September 20, 2016, and subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging FMLA interference and retaliation. The district court granted summary judgment for the Sheriff's Office on both claims. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment on the interference claim, remanding it for trial, while affirming the judgment on the retaliation claim. The case was further appealed, and in June 2025, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court's entry of judgment as a matter of law, finding that the grounds for the Rule 50(b) motion were not properly presented before the verdict. However, the court affirmed the district court's alternative decision to grant a new trial, agreeing that the evidence did not support a finding of prejudice. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. ()
Sources:
law.justia.com
IL • 1974-06-01
The case of "Chemers v. Kadukov, et al." involves a legal dispute between Bernard Chemers and several defendants, including Kadukov. Chemers, a real estate developer, engaged in a series of financial transactions with Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association, where he exchanged personal checks for Liberty Federal checks. These exchanges were approved by Edward J. Kaczmarek, the Vice-President and Treasurer of Liberty Federal. The transactions continued despite warnings from another officer to limit the size and frequency of such exchanges. Additionally, Kaczmarek received monthly cash payments from Chemers through an intermediary, John J. Viverito, as a bribe to continue the check exchanges. The case raises questions about the legality of these financial practices and the responsibilities of financial officers in overseeing such transactions. The outcome of the case has implications for banking practices and the enforcement of financial regulations.
IL • 2010-06-15
The case of "Montgomery v. Village of Thornton, et al." involves a lawsuit filed by Stephen Wragg, Jr., a sixteen-year-old fire cadet, against the Village of Thornton and its fire chief, John Klaczak. Wragg alleged that Klaczak sexually molested him during his participation in the village's fire cadet program. Despite prior allegations of misconduct against Klaczak, the village retained him as fire chief. Wragg claimed that the village's failure to act on these allegations violated his substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the village, and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this decision, concluding that Wragg failed to provide sufficient evidence of deliberate indifference by the village's policymakers. ()
Sources:
case-law.vlex.com
IL • No Date
In the case of Henry v. City of Chicago, Misty Henry, a police officer with the Chicago Police Department, filed a lawsuit alleging sexual discrimination under Title VII. She claimed that after joining a bike patrol team in May 2001, she was subjected to daily unwelcome comments and harassment from fellow officers, including an incident on May 14, 2001, where Officer Rufus James physically straddled her while making sexually suggestive remarks. Despite reporting the harassment to her supervisor, Sergeant Maurice Richards, and the department reassigning the offending officers, the harassment continued. Henry argued that the department's response was inadequate, leading to a hostile work environment. Both parties moved for summary judgment, but the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied both motions, stating that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding the hostile work environment claim and the City's potential liability.
IL • 2015-11-19
In 2008, Jorge Guzman was indicted in Will County, Illinois, for aggravated possession of stolen firearms after seven firearms were stolen from a home. The following day, Guzman and two others were found in a garage with five of the stolen firearms in plain sight. Guzman, a permanent legal resident, entered a negotiated guilty plea in February 2009, receiving a four-year prison sentence. During the plea hearing, the court inquired about his citizenship status, to which Guzman clarified he was a permanent legal resident. The court did not inform him of the potential immigration consequences of his plea, as required by Illinois law. Guzman filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing it was involuntary due to the lack of proper admonishment. The trial court denied his motion, and Guzman appealed. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, stating that the failure to provide the statutory admonishment did not render the plea involuntary, as immigration consequences are collateral and do not affect the voluntariness of the plea.
IL • 2024-05-15
In the case of Domantas v. Menard, Inc., the plaintiff, Ms. Domantas, filed a lawsuit against Menard, Inc., alleging that she tripped and fell over a protruding pole from an unattended shopping cart in the store, resulting in injuries. The central issue was whether Menard had a duty to maintain a safe environment and whether they were aware of the hazardous condition. The court examined the circumstances, including the duration the cart was left unattended and the visibility of the obstruction. Ultimately, the jury found in favor of Ms. Domantas, determining that Menard was liable for the unsafe condition that led to her fall.
